Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />in the alternative water resources plans is shown to offset a significant por- <br />tion of forecast water demands. Several of these measures can be implemented <br />at a substantially lower cost per acre-foot of water than the cost of develop- <br />men t 01 new firm y i e I d from e i the r na t i ve 0 r i mpo r t ed supp lies. A I so, ins t i - <br />tutional arrangements and water rights administration could be modified to <br />improve the economical allocation of water and overall efficiency of use. <br />Several of these potential measures have not been implemented previously else- <br />where on a large scale and wi II requi re considerable cooperation among the <br />various interests involved in water resources management and use. <br /> <br />5. Issues in Water Resources Management <br /> <br />During the approximately two-year Study process, a number of issues <br />related to management and development of water resources in the St. Vrain <br />Basin were identified and discussed with the Advisors Corrmittee, the Manage- <br />ment Convn i ttee, and other concerned c it i zens. Some issues seem to have been <br />resolved by consensus whereas others require additional investigation, study, <br />and dialog among the various interests in the Basin. Issues identified <br />include the fol lowing: <br /> <br />a. Although a wide range of views regarding water resources <br />management was expressed, a general consensus appears to have <br />been reached that water avai labi I ity for municipal, indus- <br />trial, and agricultural purposes should be the primary <br />consideration in water resources management. Important <br />secondary purposes were mentioned previously. <br /> <br />b. The monetary cost 01 water resources management and develop- <br />ment is a major issue, i nc I ud i ng the way in wh i ch the cost <br />burden wi II be shared by various water user groups or inter- <br />ests. <br /> <br />c. Agricultural interests generally desire improved regulation <br />of water suppl ies for crop irrigation. The Study findings <br />indicate, however, that only non-structural measures for <br />improving agricultural water management wi II be economical to <br />implement. Since subsidies would be requi red, methods for <br />financing arrangements for structural facilities is a crucial <br />issue in the agricultural sector. Financial arrangements for <br />faci lities for M&I water suppl ies are also an important issue. <br /> <br />d. Social concerns impacted by water resources management are <br />important to a large segment of the community, including the <br />location of major storage reservoirs, availability of rec- <br />reation, and flood control needs. Major reservoir locations <br />immediately upstream from residential communities are a par- <br />ticularly sensitive social concern. <br /> <br />e. <br /> <br />Conversion of a large <br />Thompson Project water <br />industrial use may be an <br /> <br />number of shares of Colorado-Big <br />from agricultural to municipal and <br />economic and social issue. <br />