Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />B. Public Information and Involvement Program <br /> <br />A comprehensive Publ ic Informat ion and Involvement Program (Pro- <br />gram) was conducted as an integral part of the Study. The purposes of the <br />Program were twofold: (1) to inform the publ ic as to the objectives and <br />progress of the Study, and (2) to provide opportunities for publ ic input to <br />the Management Committee and Study Team during the entire Study process. A <br />Study Advisory Committee, comprised of 16 persons representing local and <br />regional interests in the Study Area was formed to provide advice to the Man- <br />agement Committee and to serve as a liaison between the general public and the <br />Management Committee. <br /> <br />The Study Advisors met eight times with the Management Committee <br />and Study Team in formal sessions through December 1985, all of which were <br />open to the general public and news media. The Advisors also participated in <br />a public values assessment which was used to identify needs and values of the <br />various interest groups in the Basin. The Advisors provided comments on draft <br />task memoranda, Study reports, and prel iminary alternative plans for water <br />resource development. <br /> <br />C. Study Process <br /> <br />In general, the Study process included investigations, synthesis of <br />alternative plans, and evaluations performed by the Study Team, with continual <br />interaction, comment, and review by the Management Committee and by the Study <br />Advisors. This process, although requiring a longer time span to complete the <br />Study as compared to use of a more traditional approach, is more I ikely to <br />engender a broad base of support for the Study findings and recommendations. <br />The various community interests are carried forward with each element of the <br />Study so that the end product does not contain unanticipated or unacceptable <br />results from the perspective of the local water resources community. <br /> <br />Step 1 of the Study identified potential water management purposes <br />including municipal, industrial, and agricultural water supply, enhancement of <br />fish and wildlife, improvement or protection of water quality, water-based <br />recreation (reservoir and stream corridor), flood damage reduction, and hydro- <br />electric power generation. Major parts of the Step 1 effort included prep- <br />aration of an inventory of Basin water resources, irrigated land acreage, <br />population and other characteristics of the Basin. Future demands or water <br />requirements (in the caSe of irrigated agriculture) were compi led for current <br />conditions and forecast up to year 2020. A projection of electric power <br />demand to year 2020 was also made, but this projection was based on an area to <br />which such power might be marketed, rather than on needs of the St. Vrain <br />Basin. <br /> <br />Provision of water suppl ies for present and future needs of the <br />three sectors mentioned above was identified in Step 2 as the primary water <br />management purpose to be served by the plans to be formulated. The other <br />potential water management purposes were addressed to the extent they could <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />