Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.' <br /> <br />Honorable Lewis Entz <br />Honorable Diane Hoppe <br />November 12, 2003 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />Assembly and the CWCB can help identify how to help make this project a reality, Towards that <br />goal, I suggest that the Water Resources Review Committee ask the participants of the south <br />metropolitan conjunctive use study to provide a status report at a special joint meeting you could <br />sponsor with the CWCB, I also suggest that the General Assembly and the CWCB stand ready <br />to provide some amount of money to help Douglas and Arapahoe Counties implement an <br />agreement to move forward with the conjunctive use project. That money could come from the <br />resource conservation funds currently available to the CWCB and included in the annual <br />construction fund bill, <br /> <br />B. Creation of A South Metropolitan Water Authority <br /> <br />The feasibility of achieving the water supply alternatives described above can be <br />enhanced if an entity is created for the south metropolitan area to develop that water supply, At <br />present, there are many entities in Douglas and Arapahoe Counties that are involved in water <br />supply development, including many entities that have been involved iil this study, One of the <br />more challenging problems is how to form a single entity that will integrate the dozen or so small <br />water systems that currently provide water service to the area without compromising the <br />authority ofthe individual entities, This single entity is needed to allow meaningful negotiations <br />with Denver and the Colorado River District and to finance the hundreds of millions of dollars of <br />infrastructure needed to solve the water supply problem, <br /> <br />To address the challenge, the General Assembly and the CWCB should work with the <br />entities participating in the study from Douglas and Arapahoe Counties to define the best <br />mechanism for establishing a single entity for negotiation with Denver and the Colorado River <br />District on a potential project. If a project is agreed to, this single entity would be responsible for <br />implementing the project, including securing the necessary financing, As required, the General <br />Assembly should consider legislation that creates a South Metropolitan Regional Water <br />Authority ("SMRW A"), The General Assembly would define the powers of this authority but <br />the idea is for the SMRW A to finance, construct and operate a wholesale water acquisition, <br />exchange and distribution system among the existing local water service providers in the south <br />metropolitan regions of the Denver metro area, The SMRW A could have the following <br />charactistics: <br /> <br />}> The SMR W A would have the power to appropriate new water rights, acquire existing <br />water rights, issue its own bonds or contract with the Colorado Water and Power. <br />Development Authority, acquire debt, enter into agreements with local water <br />providers, seek governmental permits necessary to operate its system, and operate an <br />integrated wholesale water supply system, . <br /> <br />}> The SMR W A would develop new water supplies and facilitate trades and exchanges <br />between existing systems by building and operating a regional integrated water <br />supply infrastructure, <br /> <br />". <br /> <br />", ,c>.,. <br /> <br />_,oQ <br />