My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00052
CWCB
>
Publications
>
Backfile
>
PUB00052
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2011 11:11:40 AM
Creation date
9/30/2006 10:10:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
1998
Title
Layperson's Guide to Groundwater
CWCB Section
Interstate & Federal
Author
California Water Education Foundation
Description
Layperson's Guide to Groundwater
Publications - Doc Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />In many of these cases, the pollutants overwhelmed <br />the natural ability of the soils to filter out the pollufion, <br />or the pollutants passed through fhe soil in a shorter <br />time than required for decomposition or consump- <br />tion by organisms in the soil. A better understanding <br />of those natural dynamics is important as additional <br />contaminated sites are discovered and money for <br />cleanup diminishes. In some cases, abandoned or <br />improperly constructed water wells have become <br />conduits for pollutants - contaminating the aquifers <br />that the wells once tapped. Counties, cities and water <br />agencies are encouraged to take measures to <br />prevent wellhead pollufion by enforcing well design, <br />rehabilitafion and destruction standards, but fhose <br />efforts in some locations do not always live up to <br />their intent. <br /> <br /> <br />Groundwater Pollution <br /> <br />The quality of California's groundwater is in some <br />ways remarkable. Thousands of people drink water <br />pumped from fhe ground with litfle or no treatment <br />But the qualify of California's groundwater is <br />beginning to reflect decades of casual stewardship. <br />Many communities now face expensive remedies to <br />remove contaminants - some resulting from <br />practices that were legal and thoughf fo be benign, <br />while others resulted from years of neglect. <br /> <br />Military bases and industrial facilities for years <br />dumped fuels, used solvents and other liquid wastes <br />into pits, where the pollutants leached into the <br />groundwafer. Tens of thousands of gasoline tanks <br />were buried in the ground with few precautions to <br />limit the contamination from inevitable leaks. <br />Garbage dumps were built with inadequate safe- <br />guards or none at all. Where crop dusters and other <br />farm equipment was washed, agricultural chemicals <br />were sprayed on the ground and washed into pits <br />wifh Iiltle concern for the quality of groundwafer. <br />Residential septic tanks and agricultural feedlots also <br />were sources for nitrates, bacteria and viruses. Lack <br />of knowledge in the past led to such practices and if <br />was commonly assumed that if leaks occurred, they <br />would cause no problem underground. <br /> <br />Contamination might be less of a concern if <br />communities could easily replace tainted wells with <br />new wells or new suriace water supplies. The number <br />of wells that are known to be seriously affecfed <br />by pollution is relatively small when compared to <br />the hundreds of thousands of wells that have been <br />drilled in the state. But because most wells are <br />not tested, the full extent of the contaminalion is <br />not known. <br /> <br />NATURALLY OCCURRING POLLUTANTS <br /> <br />The natural quality of groundwater in California - <br />that is before manmade pollutants are considered - <br />depends on the source of water that recharges the <br />aquifer and the surrounding geology. For instance, <br />snow melt streaming down (or through) the granite <br />and volcanic rocks of the Sierra Nevada or Cascade <br />Mountains remains fairly pure as it seeps into aqui. <br />fers on the east side of the Central Valley. However, <br />water flowing through the marine sedimentary rocks <br />that comprise the Coast Ranges picks up naturat <br />minerals and elements. <br /> <br />The concentrations of those elements increase with <br />use. When water high in dissolved solids is used as <br />irrigation water, the minerals accumulate in the soils <br />and must be ftushed out to preserve soil produc- <br />tivity. The runoff can contain those trace elements in <br />concentrations high enough to compromise crops, <br />the health of humans, fish and wildlife. <br /> <br />Boron is an element that is an essential micro-nutri- <br />ent in trace amounts, but toxic to plants in slightly <br />greater concentrations. Boron is found in groundwa- <br />ter in concentrations harmful to plants in the north- <br />ern and southwestern Sacramento Valley and in the <br />Tulare Basin. Mercury and chromium have been <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />found in wells in the western San Joaquin Valley at <br />concentrations that exceed federal wildlife standards. <br />Arsenic, hydrogen sulfide and radon are all leached <br />out of the soils by percolating groundwater and can <br />be found in California's aquifers. <br /> <br />The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is <br />expected to promulgate a health standard for radon, <br />which comes from decaying uranium. Radon as a <br />gas dissolves in groundwater, and then volatilizes <br />as water pours through faucets. It can then be inhaled <br />or ingested and is believed to be a major cause of <br />lung cancer. Radon is a larger problem on the East <br />Coast and in other western states than in California, <br />but radon has been found in some wells in the Sierra <br />Nevada foothills and in San Bernardino County. <br /> <br />After some controversy over the appropriate safety <br />level, Congress called for an independent analysis <br />to help determine what level of safety should be set <br />for radon. The more stringent the federal standard, <br />the more wells that will be affected by the reguta- <br />tion. Thirty million people nationwide could be <br />affected by the standard. Of 449 wells surveyed in <br />southern California, 67 percent would not meet the <br />strictest standard for radon now under consideration. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.