Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />water to meet all of their needs. The solution in their <br />eyes was not regulating an inadequate supply, <br />but importing more water. <br /> <br />Similarly, Proposition 13 of 1982 would have required <br />local plans to be developed and approved by state <br />officials for 11 overdrafted aquifers. The groundwater <br />regulations - along with provisions for conserving <br />water and restricting the initial filling of New Melones <br />Dam on the Stanislaus River - were rejected by <br />voters. <br /> <br />As cities seek new water <br />supplies to meet grmving <br />demands, there is <br />increased illferest in <br />trall.\/erring growuln:aler <br />frol1l rura/fo urban areas <br />- (l complex and <br />confrol'ersial issue. <br /> <br />By the mid-1990s, however, three events pushed the <br />concept of groundwater regulation back in front of <br />state policy-makers: <br /> <br />1) With federal officials concerned that California was <br />not adequately protecting its groundwater resources <br />from contamination, the Legislature in 1992 passed <br />the Groundwater Management Act, AB 3030 (Water <br />Code Section 10750 et seq.), The law allows a variety <br />of local water agencies to voluntarily develop ground- <br />water management plans and to better coordinate <br /> <br />:,'--'d('-I' <br />- "....."....r <br />l.'~i,I_+~'_l <br />.':,-,~'J:1:~ ,. <br />J1t: ~. <br /> <br />the use of surface water and groundwater supplies. <br />known as conjunctive use. <br /> <br />2) The 1987-1993 drought raised concerns that <br />groundwater increasingly may be pumped from one <br />region and transported to another. In a specific case <br />involving Tehama County, the courts in 1994 <br />ultimately affirmed that the police powers of county <br />governments give them some regulatory authority - <br />along with the state and any special districts - over <br />groundwater (see page 18). <br /> <br />3) The State Board relied on a seldom used statute, <br />Water Code Section 2100, to warn officials in <br />Monterey County that it could request the court to <br />adjudicate the basin to prevent imminent and <br />irreparable threats to water quality in the aquifer. In <br />1994, the State Board initiated an investigation to <br />prepare for a possible adjudication, prompting local <br />officials to take steps to resolve two long-standing <br />problems: nitrogen pollution resulting from farm <br />fertilizers and sea water intrusion resulting from <br />excessive groundwater extraction. <br />