My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00048
CWCB
>
Publications
>
Backfile
>
PUB00048
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:40:30 AM
Creation date
9/30/2006 10:10:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
1992
Title
Systems Integration as a Water Supply Source for the Denver Metropolitan Area
CWCB Section
Water Conservation & Drought Planning
Author
Hydrosphere Resource Consultants
Description
Overview of water supply alternatives and suggestion for process to address future water supply needs of the Denver Metro Area
Publications - Doc Type
Historical
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />DRAFT 8/24/92, Page 27 <br /> <br />3. Optimize Use of Flood Control Reservoirs for Water Supply <br /> <br />During the 1970's the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers built three major flood control <br />reservoirs in the metro Denver area: Bear Creek, Chatfield and Cherry Creek Reservoirs. <br />Their primary purpose is to capture unpredictable floods that have historically occurred in the <br />late spring and summer months. A secondary purpose of these reservoirs is recreation, and <br />each reservoir maintains a relatively small permanent pool of water for recreational purposes. <br /> <br />These reservoirs were originall y designed to protect against a specified level of flood <br />event, typically a 500-year, 30-day flood. In the early 1980's the Corps reassessed its <br />estimates of the amount of storage required to contain such flood events and determined that <br />there was a total of 41,000 AF of excess storage available in Chatfield and Bear Creek <br />Reservoirs that could be reallocated to purposes other than flood protection. <br /> <br />Incorporating this amount of storage capacity into an integrated municipal water supply <br />system could significantly increase the yield of that system. This additional storage capacity <br />could be used to capture water storable under new water rights, currently decreed rights, <br />transferred agricultural rights and exchange rights held by municipalities. Previous studies <br />suggest that an additional safe yield of 10,000 to 15,000 AF/year could be generated. <br /> <br />a. Dedicate Excess Storage to Water Supply Purposes <br /> <br />Reallocated storage in Chatfield and Bear Creek could be operated in several ways. One <br />concept would be to fill and maintain these reservoirs at this additional level of storage and <br />draw them down for water supply only during major droughts; they would serve as reservoirs <br />of last resort. That way their recreational potential would be impacted only infrequently. <br />When needed for water supply, water could be pumped from these reservoirs to nearby <br />treatment plants, or released for downstream municipal diversion. This concept is similar to <br />Aurora's planned use of its Aurora Reservoir. <br /> <br />Another concept would be the use of excess storage capacity to capture and store water <br />from the sources described above for use on an annual basis. This mode of operation could <br />result in greater reservoir fluctuation during the summer and fall recreation season. <br /> <br />b. Seasonal Use of Flood Control Storage <br /> <br />Because the need for these flood facilities occurs primarily during the late spring and <br />through the summer months, there may be an opportunity to utilize flood control facilities for <br />storage of winter flows. An example of this concept is possible in conjunction with the Barr <br />Lake Plan discussed above under municipal first use of agricultural water. Water rights held <br />by the ditch companies involved in the Barr Lake Plan provide for the diversion and storage of <br />large amounts of South Platte River water during the winter months. These flows, or a portion <br />thereof, could be stored in Bear Creek and Chatfield Reservoirs for later release as <br />augmentation water or for direct use or diversion by metro area municipalities. The obvious <br />limiting factor would be the need to schedule releases so that sufficient flood control storage is <br />available by late spring. <br /> <br />Issues To Be Addressed <br /> <br />1. The use of storage capacity in Federal flood control reservoirs for non-Federal <br />water supply purposes requires a contract covering both financial and operational <br />aspects, between the United States and a single non-Federal contracting agency. <br />Some state entity such as the Colorado Water Conservation Board would have to act <br />as the clearinghouse agency. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.