Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />DRAFT 8/24/92, Page 26 <br /> <br />increase in the combined yield of the Denver and Northern systems of about 6,000 acre feet. <br />The benefit to the west slope would be increased flows in the Fraser river basin. <br /> <br />Issues To Be Addressed <br /> <br />Coordinated operations of the Moffat and Windy Gap projects may require changes in <br />water rights in order to maximize flexibility. <br /> <br />The Windy Gap project is currently designed to divert and pump water during late <br />spring and summer high runoff conditions. Modifications may have to be made to the Windy <br />Gap pumping facilities in order to allow for pumping during low flow conditions. <br /> <br />Coordinated project operations would require a high level of cooperative planning <br />among Denver, the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation and the Northern Colorado Water <br />Conservancy District. <br /> <br />C. Colorado Basin: Coordination Among Reservoirs <br /> <br />Seven major reservoirs with a combined active capacity of over 1,000,000 acre feet will <br />soon exist on major tributaries of the Colorado River above Grand Junction. The U.S. Bureau <br />of Reclamation operates Granby, Willow Creek and Green Mountain reservoirs as part of the <br />Colorado-Big Thompson project and Ruedi reservoir as part of the Frying Pan-Arkansas <br />project. Denver controls Dillon and Williams Fork reservoirs as part of its raw water supply <br />system. Construction will soon begin on the Colorado River Water Conservation District's <br />Muddy Creek reservoir. <br /> <br />Coordinated operations of these major water projects (in conjunction with their east <br />slope components) could result in substantial benefits in the areas of water supply yield, water <br />quality management, instream flows and recreational needs. An annual operating plan could be <br />cooperatively developed to address specific water management needs based on local and <br />regional expected runoff, demand or instream flow-related "hotspots" and carryover needs. <br /> <br />Specific examples of such operations include making replacement releases from alternate <br />points based on variances in local runoff conditions, balancing releases during critical low flow <br />period in order to minimize stress on fish populations and wastewater assimilative capacities, <br />and allowing for temporary use of one reservoir pool by another set of interests. <br /> <br />Issues To Be Addressed <br /> <br />An advanced decision support capability would be needed in order to examine various <br />operating plans and tradeoffs. The Colorado Water Conservation Board and State Engineer's <br />office are currently developing a feasibility study for such a decision support system. <br /> <br />An appropriate forum would have to be established among water users, project owners <br />and operators and public interests for articulating various needs and balancing competing needs <br />into operating plans. <br /> <br />Various local and federal law and regulations may have to be modified to allow for such <br />operational flexibility among a sphere of interests larger than originally contemplated by <br />project water rights and enabling legislation. <br />