My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00047
CWCB
>
Publications
>
Backfile
>
PUB00047
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2011 11:11:14 AM
Creation date
9/30/2006 10:09:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
2000
Title
SECWD/Arkansas Basin Preferred Storage Options Plan Final Draft Report
Author
GEI Consultants, Inc
Description
SECWD/Arkansas Basin Preferred Storage Options Plan Final Draft Report
Publications - Doc Type
Water Resource Studies
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
120
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Final Draft - Preferred Storage Options Plan <br />Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District <br />June 8, 2000 <br /> <br />Pueblo. These entities currently have storage allocations in the Project Model results <br />indicate that these entities could meet between 50 and 100 percent of their storage needs <br />from within the re-operation space. For planning, the following allocations were used, <br />based on a re-operation space of 48,500 af and assuming 57 percent of the total storage <br />need for each entity, except for CSU, could be provided by re-operation: <br /> <br /> Amount of Re-operation Storage <br /> (AF) <br />CSU 19,000 <br />FVA (excluding CSU) 12,600 <br />Pueblo Board of Water Works 11,400 <br />SI. Charles Mesa Water District 2,100 <br />City of Florence 1,300 <br />Other Entities West of Pueblo 2,100 <br />Total 48,500 af <br /> <br />The allocations of re-operation space could change during suhsequent phases of p!a!ming <br />and implementation. However, the total identified storage need for District entities far <br />exceeds the available re-operation space. Because re-operation space will be the least <br />costly storage available to District entities, it most likely will be used to the fullest extent <br />possible by those entities with Project storage allocations who need more storage <br />capacity. <br /> <br />3.3.1.4 Policy/Institutional Issues Associated With Re-operation <br /> <br />There are a myriad of policy, institutional, and legal issues that will need to be <br />successfully addressed in order to implement Re-operation Scenario B. To the maximum <br />extent possible, the operations model logic and constraints were tailored to address the <br />operating policies and procedures and Allocation Principles that form the basis for <br />successfully operating the Fry-Ark Project to meet its authorized objectives. Guiding <br />principles for project planning and simulation model development in this regard include: <br /> <br />. Re-operation will not affect the yield of the Project from its West Slope <br />and East Slope water rights. <br /> <br />. Re-operation will not increase West Slope diversions beyond those to <br />which the Project and other participating entities are legally entitled. <br /> <br />ID GEl Consultants, Inc. <br /> <br />3-4 <br /> <br />HPROJECTS\99061\~ru\Pnferred SOP FinaI,wpd <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.