My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00032
CWCB
>
Publications
>
Backfile
>
PUB00032
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2010 3:55:23 PM
Creation date
9/30/2006 10:07:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
1994
Title
Small Dam Site Reconnaissance Study - Final Report of Findings
CWCB Section
Finance
Author
Harris Water Engineering, Inc.
Description
Identify and evaluate dam sites at a recon leval, dam sites to fill a need for raw water storage
Publications - Doc Type
Tech Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
118
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />COST ESTIMATE <br /> <br />The estimated cost to construct the Beaver Creek Dam is shown in <br />Table 5 and Bear Creek Dam in Table 6. The unit costs are based <br />upon unit cost for rural areas of the state. The land cost is <br />estimated at $1000 per acre. <br /> <br />An amount of 30% is added for contingencies, which is slightly <br />higher than the normal 20% because the unit costs are not firm. <br />Engineering and administration is estimated at l5% based which <br />includes: permit applications, preparation of plans and <br />specifications and construction observation. <br /> <br />A 404 permit will be needed from the Corp of Engineers which will <br />trigger endangered species consultation and wetlands evaluations. <br />The Beaver Creek site does not appear to have any obvious <br />environmental problems but the process could be lengthy. <br /> <br />FINANCING <br /> <br />Even though Beaver Creek Dam and Reservoir would be constructed by <br />the DWCD, the repayment would be provided mostly by other sources <br />which might include: Federal Government, Division of wildlife, <br />etc.. The process to arrange the repayment has not been identified <br />and the costs and financing herein may be the motivation to pursue <br />construction of the reservoir. <br /> <br />Assuming that the reservoir might be ready for construction in the <br />near future, Table 7 shows several financing options assuming <br />financing from the CWCB. Option 1 is the standard CWCB loan terms <br />as of December, 1993; the terms change with national interest <br />rates. The other options are better terms which might be available <br />but with special CWCB approval. <br /> <br />RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> <br />Beaver Creek Dam and Reservoir is significantly less costly than <br />Bear Creek Dam and Reservoir, even though the latter is more <br />centrally located. Beaver Creek probably offers the best reservoir <br />site in the upper Dolores River drainage. <br /> <br />Beaver Creek Dam and Reservoir is a relatively inexpensive site and <br />could offer significant cost advantages if additional storage would <br />solve the fishery problem. The site should be kept on the "back <br />burner" in the event that additional storage is needed. There are <br />no specific recommendations on how to proceed with development <br />because the entities to repay the costs are not determined. Bear <br />Creek dam is probably very costly and other alternatives should be <br />investigated. <br /> <br />Beaver Creek Dam <br /> <br />17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.