<br />Nevv challenges exert a pull on Duane Helton
<br />to joi n the team
<br />
<br />Editor's note: In the last two issues, we
<br />introduced David Robbins, the legal mem-
<br />ber of the original in stream flow team and
<br />Eddie Kochman, the biologist of that
<br />team. In this issue, we are proud to intro-
<br />duce the Jastofthe three, the team's engi-
<br />neer Duane Helton.
<br />
<br />Duane Helton joined the CWCB in
<br />1969, where he was responsible for
<br />numerous water resource projects,
<br />especially in the Arkansas River basin.
<br />Shortly after the passage ofISF statute in
<br />1973, he was assigned a new challenge.
<br />With the support and encouragement of
<br />then CWCB Director Felix Sparks, Helton,
<br />along with Attorney David Robbins and
<br />Biologist Eddie Kochman, began the chal-
<br />lenging task of preparing instream flow
<br />recommendations.
<br />
<br />"I began working with Eddie Kochman
<br />very quickly," Helton says. And adds, "I
<br />and other CWCB staff members often par-
<br />ticipated in field data collections." Helton
<br />has stories to tell of their data collection
<br />adventures, including one in which an
<br />employee appeared to have a near-death
<br />experience during fish sampling. "He had
<br />to be rushed to a local hospital in the
<br />Roaring Fork Valley," Helton softly points
<br />out. Perhaps melancholic, Helton recalls
<br />these memories as if they happened yes-
<br />terday.
<br />
<br />Helton recollects that some of the first few
<br />instream flow appropriations were made
<br />in the Roaring Fork and the Gunnison
<br />watersheds. He also recalls that, in fact,
<br />before the CWCB filed for its first right in
<br />the Fryingpan-Arkansas Project collection
<br />area, the City of Aspen and Pitkin County
<br />filed for an instream flow water right nam-
<br />ing the CWCB as an inadvertent applicant.
<br />However, the application was later dis-
<br />missed by the Water Court," Helton notes.
<br />
<br />An ISF appropriation, as Helton recalls,
<br />began with the CWCB and DOW identifY-
<br />ing several streams for potential consider-
<br />ation. The DOW would then visit the
<br />streams and collect biological data. Ini-
<br />tially, the DOW staff would apply the
<br />"Montana Method," which was based on a
<br />percentage of the annual streamflows (30
<br />percent of average annual for reason-
<br />able/optimum flow and 10 percent for
<br />survival flow). Later the DOW would
<br />make specific flow measurements, using
<br />
<br />
<br />what was known as the "Sag-tape
<br />Method." Finally, based on one or a com-
<br />bination of these methods, the DOW
<br />would send its instream flow recommen-
<br />dations to the CWCB. Helton and his staff
<br />at the CWCB would evaluate these recom-
<br />mendations for accuracy and reasonable-
<br />ness. Helton would then send the
<br />recommendations to the Colorado Divi-
<br />sion of Parks and Recreation for approval,
<br />as was then required by law, before taking
<br />them to CWCB for ratification. In the
<br />meantime, Helton would meet with other
<br />water users to resolve any outstanding
<br />issues with regard to water rights adminis-
<br />tration and/or future water development
<br />in the respective streams.
<br />
<br />"The ISF Program gradually became less
<br />controversial, as water users became more
<br />educated about, or perhaps 'resigned to'
<br />the program, and our analyses got better,"
<br />Helton says. By the time Helton left the
<br />CWCB in July 1980, the CWCB and DOW
<br />had established a systematic approach to
<br />ISF quantification and appropriation that
<br />produced less conflict with other water
<br />users.
<br />
<br />After leaving the CWCB in 1980, Helton
<br />joined Woodward-Clyde Consultants.
<br />Two years later, he left Woodward-Clyde
<br />and began working for Tipton and Kalm-
<br />bach, Inc. where he managed water right
<br />and water resources projects. In 1993, he
<br />and his long-time friend and coworker of
<br />18 years, Tom Williamsen, formed the
<br />
<br />3
<br />
<br />firm of Helton & Williamsen, P.c., special-
<br />izing in water supply and water resource
<br />planning and water rights. The firm's
<br />clients include irrigators, municipalities,
<br />water conservation and conservancy dis-
<br />tricts, and state and federal agencies. "Our
<br />clients are very special to us. Some of
<br />them have been clients since 1980, moving
<br />with us from Woodward-Clyde to Tipton
<br />and Kalmbach, and from Tipton and
<br />Kalmbach to Helton & Williamsen," Hel-
<br />ton says.
<br />
<br />Helton was born and raised in Denver. He
<br />and his wife Brenda now live on 160 acres
<br />south of Kiowa. The Heltons enjoy their
<br />place of23 years where they raise cattle,
<br />hay, and trees in their spare time. They
<br />have three children: older son, Brad, is a
<br />Captain in the Army in the First Cavalry
<br />Division at Fort Hood; younger son, Phil,
<br />is an electronics technician in the fiberop-
<br />tics industry in Baltimore. Their daughter,
<br />Emily, is a freshman at Hastings College in
<br />Hastings, Nebraska. Helton received his
<br />Bachelor's degree in civil engineering from
<br />Colorado State University in 1964 and his
<br />Masters degree, also in civil engineering,
<br />from the University of Colorado in 1972.
<br />He pursued his Masters degree while
<br />working at the CWCB. Helton's hobbies
<br />include fishing. He longs for the fishing
<br />trips he used to make with his old buddy
<br />Eddie Kochman (featured in the last
<br />issue)..
<br />
|