Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Water in the West: The Challenge for the Next Century <br /> <br />The Commission believes that functioning river <br />basin forums and processes as described above can <br />playa major role in shaping, coordinating, and <br />implementing federal policy at the regional level. <br />However, we believe that there remains a need for <br />national coordination of water policy and programs, <br />especially as federal resources decline and the need <br />for priority setting becomes more acute. At a time <br />when our water resources policies are in such rapid <br />transition, it is remarkable that there is no regular <br />forum for discussion of these issues by involved <br />federal officials. <br /> <br />Coordinating Federal Strategy <br /> <br />The water problems that federal agencies deal with <br />in the West today span the jurisdictions of several <br />agencies and several departments (a detailed <br />description of the jurisdictions and authorities of the <br />various congressional committees and federal <br />agencies related to water resources is in appen- <br />dix C). However, only issues of major political or <br />national siguificance can get sufficient attention <br />from a Secretary or the President to resolve <br />interdepartmental or intradepartmental conflict. For <br />most problems, there is no forum to develop a <br />coordinated approach; hence, the common criticism <br />of federal agencies not "speaking with one voice." <br />The Commission recommends, for issues of <br />regional siguificance, the appointment of a <br />designated official who has the responsibility to <br />shepherd the issue on behalf of the President or <br />Secretary as appropriate. This person would <br />undertake to develop a clearly articulated federal <br />objective to be clearly conveyed to field <br />organizations and managers. The official would <br />name a lead organization at the field level to <br />coordinate federal activities and budgets and would <br />designate a single point of legal counsel to <br />coordinate all involved federal agency counsels. <br /> <br />xxviii <br /> <br />The Federal Role in Research and Data <br />Collection <br /> <br />Using Good Science <br /> <br />Sound, unbiased data and analysis are a prerequisite <br />to the success, efficiency, and economic prudence of <br />many federal activities. The Commission <br />recommends that when federal agencies undertake <br />projects or programs which depend on new <br />scientific research or knowledge, the agencies <br />should bring expert review and contribution to <br />research and monitoring plans, data analysis, and <br />assessment of conclusions. Options include external <br />review panels, such as National Research Council <br />review committees, and publication in peer- <br />reviewed journals. Also, joint investigations with <br />universities and professional groups, project <br />conferences, and symposia should be utilized. <br /> <br /> <br />Adaptive Management <br /> <br />When natural river systems and their associated <br />biota are combined with extensive water control <br />structures, the resulting network of inter- <br />relationships is extraordinarily complex. The <br />Commission endorses and encourages the use of <br />adaptive management wherever long-term programs <br />or projects are implemented or facilities are <br />operated that may have siguificant impact upon <br />valued environmental, social, economic, or other <br />resources, and where significant uncertainty exists <br />about the best management action or about its <br />effects. <br /> <br />Monitoring <br /> <br />In its review of the first 25 years of implementation <br />of the National Environmental Policy Act, the <br />