My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00017
CWCB
>
Publications
>
Backfile
>
PUB00017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2010 3:55:23 PM
Creation date
9/30/2006 10:03:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
1997
Title
Colorado Water Development Study
CWCB Section
Finance
Author
Buford Rice, Ray Christensen
Description
Study to assist Colorado Farm Bureau in developing recommendations and strategies for dealing with future water resource issues
Publications - Doc Type
Brochure
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
120
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Section 7 <br />Issues <br />Affecting <br />Water <br />Use and <br />Development <br /> <br />Afactor which is seen as <br />a threat to one agency <br />may he perceived as an <br />opportunity to anotha <br /> <br />The 1996 Colorado Water Needs Survey requested information <br />on threats to existing water supplies and opportunities for devel- <br />oping new supplies, This section lists commonly reported threats <br />and opportunities. Appendix A provides more detail on the ac- <br />tual responses received in these areas from survey respondents, <br /> <br />Potential threats to existing water supplies as noted on the sur- <br />veys include the following factors, <br /> <br />· Unpredictability of weather-related events and catastrophic <br />events (t100ds, droughts, tornados) which could adversely <br />impact water supply sources, treatment and delivery systems, <br />and wastewater treatment systems, <br />· Additional federal environmental regulations (Endangered <br />Species Act, etc.) which could increase instream flow require- <br />ments, limit diversions, control reservoir operation, etc, <br />· Additional federal and state water quality regulations which <br />could render some existing sources of supply unusable for <br />some purposes and increase water treatment costs, <br />· Disadvantageous changes to current State water law, or Fed- <br />eral regulations/actions, <br />· Degradation of water sources, for example due to contami- <br />nation from fertilizers, pesticides or other pollutant sources, <br />· Drawdown of aquifers and depletion of existing groundwa- <br />ter sources. <br />. Reduction of return flows resulting from conversion of irri- <br />gation use to domestic municipal use, <br />. Unquantified federal reserved water rights limiting the amount <br />of water available, <br />. Lack of storage space. <br />. Increasing restrictions on water use due to the Colorado-Kan- <br />sas water agreements and other compact requirements. <br />. Over-appropriated water rights belonging to individuals, <br />mutual ditch companies, irrigation districts, municipalities <br />and water conservancy districts, <br />· Exportation of water from the Western Slope to the Front <br />Range of Colorado and New Mexico. <br />· Uncertainty regarding physical consequences and legal im- <br />plications of increased use of groundwater in conjunctive use <br />operations. <br />. Over-utilization of existing sources by larger Front Range <br />communities, <br />. Unsustainable growth, <br />. Lack of source protection programs and previous environ- <br />mental misuses of land and water, <br /> <br />7-1 <br /> <br />__ cOloraoo <br />,._ Farm Bureau <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.