Laserfiche WebLink
<br />attaching conditions to state assistance for the construction or <br />enhancement of water infrastructure. <br /> <br />State Water proiect: Some have suggested that state government <br />play a more active role in facilitating the development of our compact <br />entitlements as the need for larger water supplies for the Front Range <br />materializes. Some have even suggested that Colorado develop a "State <br />Water Project," as was built in California. I don't know if this is a <br />viable idea, but we should not be afraid of discussing ideas like <br />this. <br /> <br />Cooperation with Aqricultural Water Users: We may also want to <br />explore ways to minimize impacts to rural Colorado as Front Range <br />municipalities purchase or appropriate water resources for trans-basin <br />diversion. For example, in response to the proposal to transfer water <br />from the Fort Lyon Canal in the Arkansas River Valley, I asked the <br />Water Conservation Board to take a hard look at the dry-year lease or <br />interruptible supply arrangements. I am fully supportive of their <br />careful examination of these options since we want to minimize adverse <br />impacts to our agricultural economy and communities. <br /> <br />A similar alternative might be for the state to promote an <br />experimental land fallowing program similar to the one Southern <br />California is undertaking. <br /> <br />At noon, you will hear about this program which will allow <br />California farmers using irrigation water to set aside up to 25 <br />percent of their productive lands in order to make additional water <br />resources available from the Colorado River for municipal and <br />industrial uses in Los Angeles. Perhaps a short-term experiment of <br />this nature would be worthwhile in Colorado as well. <br /> <br />Enhanced Information System: We might also consider increasing <br />the ability of our state agencies to coordinate water resources data, <br />information management systems, and decision support systems. This <br />might facilitate the analysis of a wide variety of proposed actions <br />and their impacts on water rights, compact obligations, instream <br />flows, and the environment. <br /> <br />Assuming these systems would be available to all interested <br />parties, the engineering and legal costs related to water resource <br />projects could be reduced substantially. Also, access to better <br />information might help us develop consensus for those projects that <br />optimize the use of water and have the least impact on the <br />environment. <br /> <br />CONCLUSION <br /> <br />At my request the Departments of Natural Resources and Local <br />Affairs have contracted for a study on options for Front Range water <br />supplies. That draft study will be described for you in just a few <br />hours. <br /> <br />Essentially, it proposes a more detailed investigation of a <br />comprehensive system for water resource management throughuut the <br />Front Range urban corridor. If we decide that this alternative is the <br /> <br />7 <br />