My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00004
CWCB
>
Publications
>
Backfile
>
PUB00004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2011 11:03:32 AM
Creation date
9/30/2006 9:58:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
2003
Title
Gunnison Basin Water: No Panacea for the Front Range
CWCB Section
Administration
Author
Land and Water Fund
Description
Gunnison Basin Water: No Panacea for the Front Range
Publications - Doc Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />End Notes <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />37 See NPS Draft General Management Plan for Black Canyan Natianal Monument and Curecanti National <br />Recreation Area (19971 (data from 1995). <br /> <br />38 1sL <br /> <br />39 CoIoredo Revised Statutes ("C.R.S") 9 37-92-102(3) (2002). <br /> <br />40 See www.cwcb.state.co.us/isf/programs/highlights <br /> <br />41 1sL <br /> <br />42 See 1991 Water Court Opinion, at 38, 1186(cL and at 48, 11122. <br /> <br />43 C.R.S. 9 37-92-102(31, as emended by Senate Bill 156. <br /> <br />44 See 16 u.s.c. 941 Offf-9. Curecanti NRA was not established as e recreation aree by legislation, but <br />rather by a Memorandum of Agreement between the Secretary of the Interior and the Bureau of Reclamation <br />on Feb. 6, 1965, an agreement based on CRSPA. <br /> <br />45 See 43 U.S.c. 9620(g). <br /> <br />46 See 43 U.S.c. 991501-1556; see also the 1965 Federal Water Project Recreation Act, 16 U.S.c. 9 <br />4601-12, which requires the Bureau to give full consideration for ways federal dams can afford outdoor <br />recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. <br /> <br />47 See 16 U.S.c. 9662(aL 9661. <br /> <br />48 Biological Opinion for the Dolores Praject Uune 9, 19801, at 4; see also Biologicel Opinion for the <br />Dallas Creek Project (hereinefter "BiOp") (Nov. 16, 19791, at 7. <br /> <br />49 Dallas Creek BiOp, at 8; Dolores Project BiOp, at 4-5. <br /> <br />50 lener from FWS Field Supervisor to the Bureau's Regional Director Uune 14, 1984). The Dallas Creek <br />and Dolores projects are to provide water for irrigation. <br /> <br />51 1991 Water Court Opinion, at 74, II 210. <br /> <br />52 1sL <br /> <br />53 See id. at 43, II 103 ("for purposes of these cases the How shall be quantified at 300 d.s."). <br /> <br />54 See the Nationel Water Rights Digest's Colorado website at <br />http://www.ridenbaugh.com/nwrd/nwref/co.htm <br /> <br />55 Memorandum of Agreement ("MOA") between Bureau, FWS, and CWCB (Aug. 16, 19951, et 8. This <br />agreement was extended by the signatory parties on June 30, 2000. Note, this How is separate from and <br />in addition to the 300 cfs minimum flow assumed for the Black Canyon during the Union Park litigation. <br /> <br />56 Telephone conversation with FWS biologist, Chuck McAda (Dec. 11, 2001). <br /> <br />Gunnison Basin Water <br /> <br />.61 . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.