My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00004
CWCB
>
Publications
>
Backfile
>
PUB00004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2011 11:03:32 AM
Creation date
9/30/2006 9:58:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
2003
Title
Gunnison Basin Water: No Panacea for the Front Range
CWCB Section
Administration
Author
Land and Water Fund
Description
Gunnison Basin Water: No Panacea for the Front Range
Publications - Doc Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />@ <br /> <br />End Notes <br /> <br /> <br />25 Many irri9ators in the Upper Basin hove diversion ri9hts to 1 cfs per 40 acres decreed roughly 100 <br />yeors ogo. These irrigators typically also have diversion ri9hts decreed in the 1940s for an edditional 3 <br />cfs/40 acres. Irrigators assert that most of their consumotive water needs are satisfied from the older 1 <br />cfs/40 acres decrees ond the more recent 1940s diversions ore essential to build up the water teble in the <br />fields and to enoble the consumptive use of the crop to occur. See Helton & Williamsen, suora; based also <br />on several conversations between the land and Water Fund and water experts in the basin (August 2001). <br /> <br />26 The Upper Basin hos an overage consumptive use of 101,219 AFA and 0 streom depletion of 102,094 <br />AFA. Assuming roughly 63,000 AF ore under irrigotion and 668,000 AF ore diverted, for each acre, diver- <br />sions ore roughly lOAF end consumption is about 1.5 AF. Helton & Williemsen, at Table 1. Recent analysis <br />indicates that diversions per acre"feet irrigated may be significantly less. <br /> <br />27 In 1963, the Commissioner of Reclemetion euthorized the Bureau's Regional Director in Salt lake City to <br />execute contracts with in-basin users junior to the Aspinall Unit, permitting the assignment to them of 60,000 <br />AFA of Aspinall unit weter. The second Union Park trial court decision 1998, along with the Supreme <br />Court's November 2000 decision that affirmed the trial court, judicially confirmed the subordination. See <br />Board of County Commr's of the Ctv. of Araoohoe v. Crvstal Creek Homeoowners' Ass'n, 14 P.3d 325, 341 <br />(Colo. 2000) ("Union Pork II"). <br />On June 1, 2000, the State of Colorado, Bureau, Upper Gunnison District, and the River District <br />renewed a contract first signed in 1995 that outlines procedures to allocate the subordination amounts. The <br />United States renewed its commitment to subordinate to a IIdepletion allowance"-capping the quantity of <br />water that may be consumed as opposed to diverted-of up to 60,000 AF of new use in the Upper Basin. <br />The Upper Gunnison District and River District agreed to submit annual reports to Bureau listing the names, <br />priority numbers, end diversion and depletion amounts of all diversion or storage facilities thet qualify for the <br />depletion allowance. <br /> <br />28 2000 Annual Report on Subordination of the Wayne N. Aspinall Unit Water Rights Within the Upper <br />Gunnnison Basin (October 1, 2001), at 3. <br /> <br />29 See h~p:/ Icdss.state.co.us (data from March 2002). <br /> <br />30 See Memorandum of Understanding Re9arding Accounting Procedures for Gunnison River Administration <br />Uune 1, 2002). <br /> <br />31 See Colorado Water Control Board ("CWCB"), Gunnison River Fact Sheet, on-line at <br />h~p:/ Icwcb.state.co.us. <br /> <br />32 Draft Management Plan, Executive Summary, at 1; see also Gunnison County Chamber of Commerce on. <br />line references et www.cLgunnison.co.us/community.develop/Demographics/ Demographics.hlm (noting that <br />1998 population of Gunnison County was 13,3221. <br /> <br />33 See CWCB Gunnison Basin Fact Sheet at h~p:/ Icwcb.state.co.us. <br /> <br />34 Phone conversation with Mark Schumacher, owner of the Three Rivers Resort in Almont, Colorado Uune <br />28, 20021. <br /> <br />35 Draft Management Plan at 2-5. <br /> <br />36 !rL <br /> <br />.60. <br /> <br />The land and Water Fund of the Rockies <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.