My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00004
CWCB
>
Publications
>
Backfile
>
PUB00004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2011 11:03:32 AM
Creation date
9/30/2006 9:58:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
2003
Title
Gunnison Basin Water: No Panacea for the Front Range
CWCB Section
Administration
Author
Land and Water Fund
Description
Gunnison Basin Water: No Panacea for the Front Range
Publications - Doc Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.22. <br /> <br />The land and Water Fund of the Rockies <br /> <br /> <br />@ <br /> <br />Moving Blue Mesa's Marketable Yield: A Myth <br /> <br />By comparison to the misconception over quantity, the definition of mar- <br />ketable yield from the Union Park litigation remains useful: it is water that is left over <br />after all other purposes of the Aspinall Unit have been met. In other words, the many <br />purposes of the Aspinall Unit, explained previously, should be satisfied first before <br />any marketable yield can be quantified. As the River District noted in an August <br />20011eUer to Secretary Gale Norton: "The amount of water available [as marketable <br />yield] after meeting these commitments, other priorities, and the Park needs, cannot <br />yet be determined.""" The following sections discuss "these commitments and other <br />priorities" beyond the existing uses that were discussed in Chapter 1. <br /> <br />D. Future Uses of Water Released from the Aspinall Unit <br /> <br />Chapter 1 explains that virtually all of the water arising in the Upper Basin is <br />already being beneficially used under valid water rights. In this section we describe <br />the many additional uses which Gunnison Basin water will be asked to meet, includ- <br />ing conditional water rights. After these uses are met, it is inconceivable that there <br />would be enough water to support an economic and financially feasible trans-moun- <br />tain diversion from the Gunnison, even if Aspinall Unit decrees allowed water <br />impounded by Aspinall to be exported to the Front Range. <br /> <br />1. Major Conditional Water Rights and Their Relationship to the Aspinall Unit <br /> <br />The priority of the marketable yield, for uses of water that are consistent with <br />the Aspinall decrees, is the same as that of the Aspinall Unit-November 13, 1957. <br />Thus, any water that could be put to use under conditional water rights senior to <br />Aspinall's rights will reduce the amount available as marketable yield as long as it is <br />used before the marketable yield water is used. This is true even if the water is not <br />presently in use. Even conditional water rights with a priority equal to that of <br />Aspinall may cut into the magnitude of the marketable yield because it will be up to <br />the United States whether to meet these rights before making water available to the <br />marketable yield. <br /> <br />Major Conditional Rights Prior or Equal to the Aspinall Unit's Priority Date <br />Holder Flow (ds) Storeage (AFA) Date Use <br />UVWUA 125 1901 Irrigation <br /> Yet to be Black Canyon of <br />United States quantified 1933 the Gunnison <br /> National Park <br />Tri-State: Tri-County 6000 73,000 1980; 1948 Hydroelectric and <br />Hydro Project other <br />Upper Gunnison 1562 88,083 1957 Various <br />District <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.