My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Lafayette 1997 WCPlan
CWCB
>
Water Conservation
>
Backfile
>
Lafayette 1997 WCPlan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2011 4:17:38 PM
Creation date
9/30/2006 9:04:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Conservation
Project Type
Water Conservation Plan
Project Name
City of Lafayette Water Conservation Plan
Title
Water Conservation Plan March 1997
Date
7/16/1997
County
Boulder
Water Conservation - Doc Type
Complete Plan
Document Relationships
Lafayette 1997 WCPlan Approval Letter
(Attachment)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
Lafayette 1997 WCPlan Implementation
(Attachment)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
Lafayette1997 WCPlan Public Notice
(Attachment)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Section 3. Conservation Measures <br /> <br />3.1 Role of Water Use Efficiency '" <br /> <br />The City addresses water efficiency with a proactive approach with monetary motivation. Few <br />policies, ordinances and codes have been or intend to be written or processed to formalize good <br />water conservation measures, The City, through its staff, has encouraged conservation through <br />design considerations of upcoming projects, through master planning, and through water rates <br />and fees required during development. <br /> <br />A typical scenario of design of a proj ect that will utilize water would include: Assess a dollar <br />value to the water rights reimbursements for each of the proposed alternatives, Assess a dollar <br />value for operations and maintenance costs for each of the proposed alternatives as well as an <br />actual amount of projected water bills for each of the proposed alternatives. <br /> <br />Base in-house'use demand of the City is about 2000 acre feet per year; irrigation and losses <br />account for approximately 1500 AF per year. <br /> <br />3.2 Conservation Measures <br /> <br />1. Water Rate Structure <br /> <br />The City implemented the inverted pyramid (or inclining block rate; as it were) in 1979. It's <br />effectiveness and continued usefulness is apparent by observing the types oflandscaping used not <br />only by new developers, but retrofits in the older neighborhoods. Water rates are reviewed on a <br />yearly basis, but the same structure is expected to remain in place, ' <br /> <br />Water rights fees for "cash in lieu" of actual water rights have provided a great incentive for <br />water conservation. The City currently charge's $4,200 per acre foot for acquisition of water <br />rights, with the right to reevaluate after one year of actual usage. <br /> <br />2. EducationlDissemination of Information <br /> <br />The City intends to continue to distribute methods of conservation of water through its rnonthly <br />newsletter and public access cable television channel. <br /> <br />4. Leak Repair and Detection <br /> <br />The City will continue to monitor water sales versus production. With the high pressures of the <br />system and tight clay soils, leaks are easily detectable. The City continues to evaluate portions of <br />the system for cost effectiveness of replacement. <br /> <br />-4- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.