Laserfiche WebLink
<br />SURVEY CONCLUSIONS <br /> <br />The small number of surveys returned, especially for Building 300, limits the usefulness of <br />the results of this survey. However, some conclusions can be inferred from the results. In <br />general, the water conserving devices appear to be acceptable to the guests. <br /> <br />Toilet blockage was expressed as a problem in both buildings. From the surveys it is not <br />possible to know if the blockage problems were due to the nature of the toilets or some other <br />factor. Faucets drips were found in both buildings and were considered to be acceptable to <br />unacceptable. The water conserving showerheads were rated more highly than the non- <br />conserving devices (93% rated 3 or better versus 60%). The surveys do not indicate that <br />sink faucet aerators were notable in either a positive or negative way. The surveys do <br />indicate that leaking faucets are considered satisfactory to unacceptable. This suggests that in <br />addition to retrofits, other water conserving steps can be taken (repair of leaking fixtures), <br />and would be perceived by guests in a positive manner. <br /> <br />rtr\wp51 \docs\cwcb\sur _res <br /> <br />USER SURVEY <br /> <br />w~ are cODdu~ting. JUrvey of out guclla' OPUUODJ of varioua faciIWc., 10 lbat we may kDow bow tD iocrcuc your <br />eDJoyment durmg your llay. Plcuc nlc the performance of the following ckvK:eI. .. <br /> <br />Room , , <br /> <br />Building , <br /> <br />Excellent <br />5 4 <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />U....eptihlc <br />2 1 <br /> <br />CoIIIIDCDU <br /> <br />1) The showers <br /> <br />2) The n:frigcrator <br /> <br />3) Tho ""vo <br /> <br />4) The. sink faucets <br /> <br />5) Tho IeUo" <br /> <br />General comments : <br /> <br />Thank: you for taking the time to help U& .SlCsa our facilities. <br /> <br />""I'\01-27-44\su....oy2 <br />