My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Sterling 1996 WC Plan
CWCB
>
Water Conservation
>
Backfile
>
Sterling 1996 WC Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/20/2011 4:16:03 PM
Creation date
9/30/2006 9:04:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Conservation
Project Type
Water Conservation Plan
Project Name
City of Sterling Water Conservation Plan
Title
Water Conservation Plan
Date
6/21/1996
County
Logan
Water Conservation - Doc Type
Complete Plan
Document Relationships
Sterling 1996 WCPlan Apprvl Ltr
(Attachment)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
Sterling 1996 WCPlan Proof of Publication
(Attachment)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
Sterling 1996 WCPlan WorkPlan
(Message)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />: I <br />\ <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />__Lum__ <br />I <br />I <br />, <br />j <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />STERLING WATER CONSERVATION PLAN <br /> <br />MAY 28, 1996 <br /> <br />CHAPTER 3 - UTILITY ECONOMICS <br /> <br />Utility Finances <br /> <br />The Engineering Company (TEC) developed a utility rate study for the City in 1995 <br />entitled Sterling Water and Sewer Rates & Cost of Service Analysis. The purpose of <br />the study was to review the various sources of revenue, determine the equability of the <br />distribution of charges, and recommend rates and fees for water, and wastewater <br />service that will generate the funds required to meet the cash requirements and support <br />the City's policies. <br /> <br />The study used cost-of-service principles to evaluate required rate adjustments for <br />each customer class and determined the currently adopted water rates that are <br />sufficient for projected fiscal obligations. The report includes the following analyses for <br />each utility reviewed: <br /> <br />1. Projection of the total revenue requirements from 1996 - 2001 <br />2. Allocation of the revenue requirements to the functional cost components. <br />3. Distribution of the component costs to the customer classes. <br />4. Determination of charges. <br />5. Review of Plant Investment Fees. <br /> <br />The basic objective of the rate study was the development of a rate structure that will <br />attain the maximum degree of equability among customers, will be consistent with local <br />practice and conditions, and will be in the best interest of both the customers and the <br />City. <br /> <br />Revenues <br /> <br />Revenues for water funds are derived from the sale of water, plant investment fees, <br />interest income, and miscellaneous fees. Of $773,504 in 1993 revenue, $713,714 <br />came from the sale of water, $22,426 from interest income, $6,030 from tapping fees, <br />and $31,334 from other revenues. Revenues in 1996 are projected to be $952,000. <br /> <br />.. ___Water_~~t.!t~~_n____~_____________________________ _. <br /> <br />The previous water rate schedule was adopted in 1983. The rates were <br />subsequently increased in 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, and 1995. Since 1990, the <br />total increase in the mon*.hIy minimum charge was 28 percent; and the volume <br />charge was 50 percent. The effective annual increase in the monthly minimum <br />over that period has averaged 5 percent while the annual increase in the volume <br />charge is 8.4 percent. <br /> <br />The City Council adopted a new minimum charge schedule on December 12, 1995. <br />The new rate format lowered the minimum volume to 4,000 gallons and eliminated <br />the $0.06 increase in the volume charge for use over 15,000 gallons. Another <br />modification was to set the monthly minimum charge based on the meter size to <br />reflect the higher cost of maintaining the larger meters. The current rates are <br />shown in Table 1. <br /> <br />Page13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.