Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2. Eliminate the licensing of The staff is concerned that the elimination of the <br /> weather modification licensing requirement from the statutes might lead to <br /> operators an increase in operations being conducted by people <br /> who are less than qualified. However, we understand <br /> the sunset committee intended that qualifications for <br /> the person in charge of the project should be made <br /> part of the permit application. <br /> Section 3, page 3, lines 10-24 <br /> Section 6, page 6, lines 15-20 The purpose of licensing is to establish that the <br /> Section 7, page 6, lines 15-20 person in control of the project has the appropriate <br /> page 7, Hne 1 <br /> Section 15, page 23. lines 25~26 qualifications-to run the-project without harm to <br /> page 24, line I people or the environment. The qualifications for <br /> and in other various sections operators of ground based winter projects were <br /> recently made less stringent with passage of HB92- <br /> 11129 in 1992. <br /> I We have had no complaints about the licenses except <br /> that they are issued on a calendar basis. However, as <br /> long as the qualifications of the operator can be <br /> incorporated into the permit, and reasonable fees can <br /> be set to recover lost license fee revenue, we can go <br /> along with the recommendation. <br />3. Require tbat tbe We would revise the existing rules and regulations <br /> qualification, education, and to include these changes. <br /> experience of the weather <br /> modification operator be <br /> provided in the weather <br /> modification permit <br /> application <br /> Section 8, page 8. lines 20-22 <br /> <br />4 <br />