Laserfiche WebLink
<br />In addition to the repeated sediment transport sampling, we collected random grab samples <br />from pool margins throughout the study reach in Oct. 1996; these were wet-sieved and weighed. <br />Coarse sediments forming the channel bed in rifiles and runs were measured during random-walk <br />clast counts. Infiltration of fine sediments into gravel and cobbles at the tail of pools was <br />measured with a surface and a subsurface grab sample from the upstream pool in Reach II during <br />Oct. 1996. The infiltration sites will be re-sampled as soon as flow is reduced to a minimum for <br />the 1997-98 winter. <br /> <br />Results <br /> <br />1) Initial depositional patterns, The majority of the initial sediment deposition occurred in pools, <br />Pools immediately downstream from the dam were completely filled, with more than 3m of <br />vertical deposition in the pool thalweg, Adjacent riftles and runs had relatively little deposition. <br />Small bars (up to 2m long and 1m wide) formed along the channel margins in areas offlow <br />separation along rifiles and runs, and fine sediment infiltrated the matrix of the channel bed to a <br />depth of 6 cm, Rooted aquatic plants growing from the channel bed along the rifiles were still <br />present and unburied following the &ediment release, suggesting that the sediment-release flow <br />was not very erosive. <br /> <br />Sediment deposition followed a distinct fining trend downstream. Sediment filling pools <br />immediately below the dam had a substantial component of sand and fine graveL The sediment <br />filling pools in study Reach II was primarily clay to fine sand (Figure 2a), Sediment concentration <br />also decreased downstream from the dam. At Reach I (500 m downstream), the pool was <br />completely filled, At Reach II, pools 2,8 and 3.2 km downstream lost approximately 65% and <br />50% of the volume to sediment infill, respectively, At Reach III, a pool 4.9 km downstream lost <br />30% of its volume, Sediment deposited in the pools of Reaches II and III formed a veneer of <br />fairly uniform thickness over the pool bottom, suggesting that it settled from suspension. High- <br />water marks from the sediment-release flow correspond to a maximum discharge of 140 m3/s. <br /> <br />2) Repeat surveys, The pools in Reaches I and II were re-surveyed on 31 March 1997, following <br />a month of flows that rose to 3,93 m3/s (Figure 3), These surveys revealed two distinct trends, <br />(1) Pool geometry had been altered as a result of sediment erosion and deposition, Each of the <br />pools has a relatively narrow (14, 19, and 22 m, respectively) upstream width where flow enters <br />the pool from a steep rifile. At approximately half of the pool length, width lessens considerably <br />(10, 16, and 12 m) in association with a bedrock constriction along one wall, and maximum depth <br />occurs immediately downstream (1-2 m) from this constriction. Width again increases (20, 21, <br />and 26 m) at the downstream end of the pool, where the bed rises to a maximum elevation before <br />dropping off steeply into the next rifile, As noted previously, the initial sediment release had <br />largely created an even-depth veneer of fine sediment over this topography at the pools in <br />Reaches II and III Subsequent reworking created a steep-sided, narrow thalweg at the upstream <br />end of each pooL Sediment was scoured to the pre-sediment-release bed in this thalweg, but , <br />additional sediment was deposited along the channel margins on top of the Sep, 1996 sediment <br />(Figure 4a). The pool at the constriction had relatively little net change. The thalweg scoured to <br />nearly the original bed Ieve, and shifted laterally, but some additional sediment was added to the <br />channel margin opposite the bedrock constriction (Figure 4b), In each case, the downstream <br />