My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Castle Rock Teach by Example Final Report
CWCB
>
Water Conservation
>
Backfile
>
Castle Rock Teach by Example Final Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/20/2011 3:13:03 PM
Creation date
9/30/2006 9:03:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Conservation
Project Type
Ag/Muni Grant
Contract/PO #
C153616
Applicant
Town of Castle Rock
Project Name
"Teach by Example" - Water Conservation Make Over at Three Homes
Title
"Teach By Example" Program Final Report
Date
6/1/1995
County
Douglas
Water Conservation - Doc Type
Final Report
Document Relationships
Castle Rock Teach by Example Application
(Attachment)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
Castle Rock Teach by Example Contract
(Attachment)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
Castle Rock Teach by Example Letter
(Attachment)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
Castle Rock Teach By Example Prog Report
(Message)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
Castle Rock Teach By Example WorkPlan
(Attachment)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />TOWN OF CASTLE ROCK <br />; "Teach By Example" Program Surnmary <br />Page 1 0 <br /> <br />wheel barrel load at a time, using the material for the trailer parking area. <br /> <br />We increased the size of a paver walkway next to the blue grass. Flagstones were <br />used to create a bird feeding area with the use of ornamental parnpasgrass for an accent. <br />The remaining area was lined with sumac, perennials and shrubs for interest. <br /> <br />Automatic irrigation systems were installed at each address by Sunrise Landscaping. <br />These systems were designed around plant material needs, exposures, wind, and slopes. <br />Most areas used drip irrigation, so water will be used only by the plants that need it. Spray <br />heads were used in grass and wildflower areas mostly. These were carefully placed to <br />achieve maximum coverage without over spray. Keith and his crew did a great job, and we <br />thank them for all their effortsl <br /> <br />Exterior consumption increased in two of the three households. This was due in part <br />to plant establishment in all locations. <br /> <br />t <br /> <br />; <br /> <br />At 200 Johnson Drive, the Hopkins, there was also a problem with the irrigation <br />clock for the drip system. This zone ran more than necessary, and was corrected later in <br />the irrigation season. The establishment consumption should still decrease over their <br />previous exterior consumption due to the amount of grass that was removed. The water <br />requirement for that established grass was still at least three to five times higher than that <br />of the new plant material. Their exterior water consumption should be tracked over the <br />next few years to prove this theory. <br /> <br />At 929 Oakwood Dr., the Nettles, initial exterior water consumption was probably <br />lower than the landscape required. Each landscape was inspected prior to selection of that <br />homeowner as a participant, however this occurred during the fall. This lead to what may <br />have been a false indication as to how the landscape was maintained prior to retrofit. Once <br />the newly planted material is established, continued irrigation should only be required on <br />the bluegrass area in the back yard. <br /> <br />At 1766 Foxfield Dr., the Hargroves, the reduction in exterior water consumption was <br />dramatic. <br /> <br />OVERAll <br /> <br />On a whole, water conservation is a personal commitment. If a person is looking <br />solely for financial benefits from saving water on their water bill, retrofitting an existing <br />home and landscape is probably not worth the work involved. Conservation is a personal <br />choice. The overall benefits are more easily revealed on the larger scale, by the water <br />supplier involved. 1994 per capita usage for residential customers only was a low 125 gcd. <br />C.:, This does not include system demand or 1055, or any other account type usage. Our <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.