My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Weather Mod Report - 1977
CWCB
>
Water Conservation
>
Backfile
>
Weather Mod Report - 1977
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/19/2011 12:53:09 PM
Creation date
9/30/2006 9:02:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Conservation
Project Type
General OWC
Project Name
Weather Modification
Title
"What Should Colorado Be Doing in Weather Modification"
Date
11/9/1977
County
Statewide
Water Conservation - Doc Type
Final Report
Document Relationships
Senate Bill 96-695
(Message)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />,- ~ <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />coveT the liability risks with its umbTella. And it can lift the issue <br />of rights to the augmented water to the level of the general welfare, <br />which is keeping with the multiplier effect of incremental water values <br />on neaTly all otheT economic producers in the State. The State can <br />also surmount the obstacles raised on the one hand by the absence of an <br />established Federal policy and the apparent difficulty of establishing <br />one, and on the other hand by the weakness of more local interests in <br />tackling actions that by their nature are best carried forward on a <br />regional basis. <br /> <br />So, in summary, what should Colorado do about precipitation management? <br /> <br />1. Colorado should recognize precipitation management as a valuable <br />opportunity if it is taken advantage of and as a mounting problem if it <br />is not. <br /> <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />2. The Administration should undertake staff studies that will plot <br />the cumulative course of water famine and determine decision points <br />along it for remedial action, including precipitation management. <br /> <br />3. The Administration should recommend comprehensive legislative <br />authorization and funding for a standby program that can be put into <br />effect promptly whenever the appropriate decision point is reached. <br /> <br />~ Colorado should provide for competent, impartial assessment of the <br />outcome of all precipitation-management activities carried out within <br />the State. This assessment should focus on decisionmaking aspects <br />from the viewpoint of the general welfare and avoid bogging down i~ <br />scientific controversies. ~ <br /> <br />5. The Administration should recommend as part of the legislative <br />authorization, a legislative basis for compensating citizens who <br />are disbenefitted in certain recognizable ways by precipitation-manage- <br />ment actions taken for the sake of the general welfare and provide <br />the administrative machinery for settling claims of this nature. <br /> <br />Though I am here only as an individual and not as a representative of my <br />employer, the Bureau of Reclamation, I cannot refrain from mentioning <br />the impact of what Colorado does on the Colorado River Augmentation <br />Demonstration Project which Project Skywater now has in the initial <br />planning phase. This project, if it is not killed, will directly affect <br />all the Upper Basin states and should logically develop as a cooperative <br />program among them and the Federal government. <br /> <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.