My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Weather Mod Report - 1977
CWCB
>
Water Conservation
>
Backfile
>
Weather Mod Report - 1977
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/19/2011 12:53:09 PM
Creation date
9/30/2006 9:02:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Conservation
Project Type
General OWC
Project Name
Weather Modification
Title
"What Should Colorado Be Doing in Weather Modification"
Date
11/9/1977
County
Statewide
Water Conservation - Doc Type
Final Report
Document Relationships
Senate Bill 96-695
(Message)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />'-.... <br /> <br />of direct impacts on the natural environment of additional snowpack in the <br />mountainous areas. I shall follow the outline drawn up by the Skywater IX <br />environmental workshop groups which spent a week, just about a year <br />ago, summarizing our present state of knowledge on this subject. <br /> <br />The first topic was effect of increased snowpack on abiotic aspects of the <br />mountain environment, including precipitation itself as an environmental <br />element, then effect of added snowfall on microclimate, erosion, avalanches, <br />and water yield, and finally effects on fluvial geomorphology and water <br />quality. Effect on the duration of snowcover is expected to be the <br />most readily detectable. Effects on erosion, fluvial processes, and <br />sediment yield might become apparent but would be very difficult to <br />distinguish from the much larger effects attributable to summertime <br />precipitation. <br /> <br />d <br />. <br /> <br />Based on research on avalanches conducted by the U.S. Forest Service and <br />the Institute of Alpine and Arctic Research of the University of Colorado <br />showing that avalanche hazard is determined by details of snowpack <br />structure and within-storm snow accumulation, and that the major avalanche <br />chutes run during every large storm, additional snowfall attributable <br />to precipitation augmentation was not seen as having a significant <br />effect on avalanche hazard to life, property, or the environment. On <br />the contrary, the improved understanding and forecasting of avalanche <br />hazards derived from this research, which was stimulated by the prospect <br />of snowfall augmentation, was felt to have decreased the overall avalanche <br />hazard. <br /> <br />Vegetation, the principal link between the abiotic environment and higher <br />life forms, was the second topic. Extent and duration of snowcover were <br />identified as the key factors, and a need for better information as to <br />where added snow will fall, how it will drift and accumulate, and how <br />these processes would affect snowcover duration on a local scale is of <br />prime concern. Within areas of late-lying snow, some change in species <br />composition is to be expected, tending to favor the rarer plants. <br />Elsewhere, added snowfall is expected to increase the general level of <br />vegetational productivity. No salient adverse effects are to be <br />expected. <br /> <br />The workshop group expressed high concern for offsite impacts on <br />vegetation arising through broad-scale changes in land-use that might ensue <br />should the added water supply result in much conversion of rangeland to <br />cropland. However, since this effect is mediated through the socio- <br />economic and political environments, I shall not consider it further <br />at this moment. <br /> <br />The workshop on animals considered the web of effects through habitat <br />and food on particular animal species identified as indicators of general <br />ecological effect. In the mountain environments of the Upper Colorado <br />Basin, the most likely effects are considered to arise from restriction to <br />movement and greater difficulty of access to food for elk, rnuledeer, and sage <br />grouse. Adverse effects on pronghorn would be expected if much rangeland <br /> <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.