Laserfiche WebLink
<br />b) Evaluation <br /> <br />The negative effects associated with the permanent transfer of agrtcultural water rtghts <br />to municipal use have been well documented. These Impacts fall on both buyers and sellers <br />as well as on third parties not directly Involved In the water sales. The options program Is <br />designed to avoid these Impacts to the benefit of all parties. Development of guidelines that <br />meet the needs of both the municipal and agricultural entities who are potential participants. <br />thus enabling the District to Implement the program. will constitute success for the project. <br /> <br />3. Origin of the project: <br /> <br />The concept of agrtcultural option contracts to achieve efficient water use Is gaining <br />prominence in the western United States. Factors including population growth. <br />agrtcultural-to-urban demographic shifts, water scarcity. and the recognition that large-scale <br />water supply projects will be Increasingly dlfflcult to build. have led to Innovative alternatives <br />such as dry-year options to use water more efficiently. <br /> <br />4. Legal, Institutional, sociological, or environmental constralnts <br /> <br />MuniCipal and agrtcultural users hlstortcally have had a relationship that can be better <br />descrtbed as contentious than cooperative. Municipal users have generally preferred to own <br />their water rights outright rather than relying on contract arrangements. and Irrigators have <br />been suspicious of municipal attempts to acquire water from the agrtcultural sector. The <br />District's Intent Is to work with both municipalities and Irrigators to formulate a project that <br />will meet the needs and concerns of both communities, thereby overcoming their reticence to <br />enter Into Innovative supply arrangements that achieve the most efficient use of Colorado's <br />water. <br /> <br />The environmental Impacts of the program will be positive ones. Keeping water on <br />agrtculturalland will preselVe the green. open spaces that Coloradans have declared are an <br />important part of the state's landscape. rather than drying up land unnecessarily. <br /> <br />5. Transferring project results: <br /> <br />Project results will be communicated to C-BT allotment holders, Windy Gap <br />participants. and other Interested parties through presentations at District and Subdistrict <br />board meetings. regular water users' meetings, and other public meetings. A formal document <br />setting out program guidelines. along with explanatory information, will be prepared. This <br />document can be used by other Colorado entities Interested in formulating similar programs. <br />as well as by those directly Involved In the District's program. <br /> <br />These guidelines will be helpful to districts, cities and Irrigators throughout Colorado <br />that are Interested In pursuing dry-year options. Governor Romer has recognized the potential <br />of these arrangements to avoid the disruption often associated with acquisition of water for <br />municipal use. and has called for Investigation of this alternative means of providing municipal <br />supply. Such arrangements could offer substantial benefits to the state as a whole. Had the <br />city of Aurora been able to rely on dry-year option arrangements rather than purchasing water <br />rtghts In the Arkansas River basin, the well-known adverse Impacts associated with dry-up of <br />agrtculturallands In that basin might have been avoided. <br /> <br />[WPSIENGINEERlNG <br />SCO'lT <br />'474 <br /> <br />3 <br />