My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CBT/WG Water Sharing Report
CWCB
>
Water Conservation
>
Backfile
>
CBT/WG Water Sharing Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/19/2011 11:57:12 AM
Creation date
9/30/2006 9:01:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Conservation
Project Type
Ag/Muni Grant
Applicant
Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District
Project Name
Ag Options
Title
Interruptible Supply Contracts for Water-Sharing Between the Colorado Big Thompson and Windy Gap Projects
Date
1/1/1996
County
Larimer
Water Conservation - Doc Type
Final Report
Document Relationships
NCWCD Ag Options Program Applic
(Attachment)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
NCWCD Ag Options Program Award Letter
(Attachment)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
NCWCD Ag Options Program Prog Report
(Attachment)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />10. Would you consider entering into an interruptible supply contract as proposed by <br />NCWCD? (Remember this is just a survey. You're not obligated in any way if you answer <br />'yes".) <br /> <br />Yes 6 <br />No 12 <br />Don't know 8 <br /> <br />Respondents answering "yes" indicated a willingness to lease amounts ranging from <br />25 to as much as 300 units apiece. Two respondents who checked "don't know" stated <br />that they might be willing to option similar quantities. <br /> <br />11. Do you think other C-BT unit-holders in your area might be interested in entering into <br />interruptible supply contracts for dry-year transfers? <br /> <br />Yes 4 <br />No 5 <br />Don't know 18 <br /> <br />One respondent checked "yes" and added a comment: "they're getting ready to <br />retire and can use the $." <br /> <br />12. If you were to consider entering into an interruptible supply contract, would you prefer <br />to receive: <br /> <br />Single payment when contract signed - 5 <br />Smaller annual payment - 0 <br />Smaller payment when K signed plus payment in exercise years - 16 <br /> <br />(One respondent checked all three. These responses are not included in the <br />numbers given above.) <br /> <br />13. If you enter into an interruptible supply contract, you will continue to take delivery of <br />the water in almost all years. When the water is transferred to the Windy Gap Project under <br />the contract, would you: <br /> <br />Fallow land because you don't receive the C-BT water - 5 <br />Continue crop production using other water sources - 8 <br />Continue crop production on a dry-land basis - 9 <br /> <br />(Note: some respondents checked more than one. One indicated that other water <br />sources would be used, but added the notation "would be in problem situation".) <br /> <br />14. Knowing that you would continue to receive the water in almost all years, what is <br />the longest tenn for which you would consider entering into an interruptible supply contract? <br /> <br />Oyrs 4 <br /> <br />A-9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.