My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Centennial WSD 1996 WCPlan
CWCB
>
Water Conservation
>
Backfile
>
Centennial WSD 1996 WCPlan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/20/2011 3:03:18 PM
Creation date
9/30/2006 9:01:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Conservation
Project Type
Water Conservation Plan
Project Name
Centennial Water & Sanitation District Water Conservation Plan
Title
Water Management Study
Date
8/10/1995
County
Arapahoe
Water Conservation - Doc Type
Complete Plan
Document Relationships
Centennial WSD 1996 WCPlan Approval Ltr
(Message)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
Centennial WSD 1996 WCPlan Implmtn Plan
(Message)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
Centennial WSD 1996 WCPlan Proof of Notice
(Message)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />] <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />1 <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />-J <br />I <br />I <br />J <br /> <br />CHAPTER 7 <br /> <br />WATER CONSERVATION BENEFIT <br />TO COST ANALYSIS <br /> <br />This chapter evaluates the selected conservation measures for the quantitative reduction <br />of water use and wastewater production, and economic considerations. In general, results of the <br />evaluation show a potential additional savings over the District's existing conservation program <br />of about 225 acre feet per year for the new conservation measures enacted over a 5-year period. <br />In addition, this chapter discusses qualitative evaluation criteria that include factors, other than <br />cost, that may impact the acceptability of the individual conservation measures. <br /> <br />During the implementation of new conservation measures, a period of time is needed for <br />consumer education and acceptance. A typical consumer adaptation period for the phasing in <br />of conservation measures is from 3 to 5 years. An exception to this basic role is for the onset <br />emergency water shortages or severe drought conditions during which communities have shown <br />substantial water savings in very short periods of time. <br /> <br />ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE CONSERVATION PROGRAM <br /> <br />The District and its constituents want to enact conservation measures that are cost <br />effective. With that in mind, the economic analysis of conservation measures is described in the <br />following paragraphs. <br /> <br />Conservation Program Benefits <br /> <br />As a general role, conservation affects two main areas of water use: (1) internal year- <br />round use; and (2) outside or seasonal use. The measures focusing on internal use have the <br />added benefit of reducing wastewater flows, while the outside or seasonal measures affect the <br />summer peak use within-the system but !lave no effect en wastewater flow redllctien. Peak use <br />is important because the size of water system facilities must be adequate to accommodate peak <br />seasonal demands. <br /> <br />The monetary benefits to the District from a conservation program include: <br /> <br />· Reduction of operating costs or the marginal cost of delivering water and <br />treating wastewater. <br /> <br />· Reduction of the costs for new water supplies by reducing ultimate long <br />tenn demand. <br /> <br />· Delay of construction of new or expanded water and wastewater facilities. <br /> <br />21-6657 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.