Laserfiche WebLink
Upper Colorado River Management Plan Alternative <br /> Stakeholder Group Workplan Outline (6-9-08) <br /> Core Questions: <br /> • How do we reconcile the BLM timeline with the 2009 field research? <br /> • Should we focus on existing hydrology first and then move to how to characterize future <br /> hydrology? What is the best way to assess future hydrology? <br /> • What are the factors for deciding among protection measures?(Permanency, Degree of ORV <br /> Protection, Legality, Flexibility for Water Operations,General Acceptability, Ease of <br /> Implementation, Enforceability,what else?) <br /> • Is the timeline realistic? How will the work get done? Where is consultant expertise/assistance <br /> needed? <br /> • Is it reasonable to develop management elements after the protective measures? Do these <br /> need to be articulated in the late fall refined plan that goes to BLM? <br /> June—August <br /> Problem Definition: Assess Flow Targets <br /> SG Mtgs Tasks <br /> 1— Evaluate GCSMP Flow Targets—if recommend for adoption,go to#2 <br /> June <br /> 20 <br /> BLM Received Conceptual Plan <br /> Recreation Recreation Hydrology Water Quality Land Use <br /> Floatboating Fishing (could hold off til <br /> later) <br /> Evaluate existing Evaluate Determine the Develop approach Complete <br /> information on existing hydrographs compilation of <br /> flows and use information for the existing baseline data <br /> on flows and conditions <br /> access& matrices <br /> facilities <br /> Survey with Conduct Baseline <br /> commercial CDOW fish monitoring <br /> outfitters surveys <br /> Onsite user Conduct fish Identify specific <br /> surveys: flow concerns& <br /> floatboating and modeling, as evaluate legal <br /> drift fishing appropriate authority <br />