My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Wild and Scenic Management Plan Alternative Proposed
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
8001-9000
>
Wild and Scenic Management Plan Alternative Proposed
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2016 3:42:36 PM
Creation date
10/12/2016 3:42:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Documents related to the Upper Colorado River Wild and Sceni Stakeholders Process
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
2/28/2011
Author
CWCB
Title
Wild and Scenic Management Plan Alternative Proposed
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Preliminary Draft <br /> 12-23-12 <br /> Memorandum <br /> To: W&S Stakeholder Group <br /> From: W&S Drafting Committee <br /> Re: MOU for implementation of SG Plan <br /> Date: December_,2012 <br /> The Upper Colorado River Wild& Scenic Stakeholder Grout($G)asked the Drafting <br /> Committee to develop a recommendation regarding what inii dum(s) of <br /> understanding(MOUs) would be appropriate for execution by SCP embers as we move <br /> forward with implementation efforts under the SG Matiagernent Plan. Following is a <br /> summary of the Drafters' recommendations: <br /> 1. Current period prior to "effective date"of Q Plan : ,,prior to issu ice of <br /> records of decision by BLM and USFS apprtMn the SG Plan as the management <br /> alternative without material change). <br /> • The Drafting Committees re ., endation isithe stakeholders do not <br /> need an MOU to govern SG efforts ptior to BLI and USFS approval of <br /> the proposedSGPlan. <br /> • The S'efforts"durIng this period are governed by the Timeline and Task <br /> List iii At .chment B, Section 2,:which provides specifics regarding(1) <br /> decision making;(2)jwding; and(3)tasks. <br /> 2. ppvisional' d MOW. <br /> J <br /> ,• One of the sks during the current pre-Plan period is for the stakeholders <br /> to "[d]evelo =[an] MOU among SG members for [the] provisional period <br /> of[the] Plan." [Attachment B, Section 2.J]. The provisional period MOU <br /> is Abe executed after BLM/USFS adopt the Plan. [Attachment B, Section <br /> 3.A(2) „ <br /> • The Drafting Committee believes that a very simple MOU should be <br /> developed for execution following the effective date of the Plan. This <br /> MOU would be signed by entities electing to become formal members of <br /> the SG Plan, once the Plan is approved. A draft MOU for this purpose is <br /> attached to this memo. In preparing it,the Drafting Committee took care <br /> to keep it as simple as possible and to avoid restating or re-characterizing <br /> the provisions of the SG Plan. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.