My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCA 2013 Annual Meeting Minutes
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
7001-8000
>
ARCA 2013 Annual Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/13/2016 9:03:16 AM
Creation date
9/2/2016 10:47:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Arca 2013 Annual Meeting Minutes
State
CO
KS
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
12/18/2013
Author
Advanced Court Reporting Services
Title
Arkansas River Compact Administration Compact Year 2013 Annual Meeting
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Minutes
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
241
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
31 <br /> 1 ability we had . to allow for excess capacity <br /> • 2 contracts from the Joint Use Pool , and we are <br /> 3 currently talking with the District about a legal <br /> 4 analysis that shows that we have authority to do so , <br /> 5 and Reclamation at our first analysis suggested that <br /> 6 we don ' t - - the Corps said that they don ' t and we <br /> 7 don ' t believe the District does either, so the <br /> 8 District disagrees with us and we ' re working to see <br /> 9 what the result of that will be . <br /> 10 So the last item on this list is the proposed <br /> 11 amendments . We ' ll go ahead and move to the next <br /> 12 slide . So the - - this request , as the Corps of <br /> • 13 Engineers stated, is for use of the City ' s water <br /> 14 upstream of the reservoir outside the District <br /> 15 boundaries and for additional dryup of linked up <br /> 16 acreage that the District currently owns or has <br /> 17 dryup covenants for . <br /> 18 So at the request of the District , as the <br /> 19 proponents , as one of the signatories , they had to <br /> 20 propose that those amendments to the City ( sic) , and <br /> 21 gave them as a signatory to the other signatories . <br /> 22 At the request of the District , we are working <br /> 23 directly with the City and we met with them a couple <br /> 24 weeks ago before our project review meeting and then <br /> 111 25 they in return are responding to some information <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.