Laserfiche WebLink
Lower South Platte River Study <br /> Colorado Water Conservation Board <br /> ' December 2001 <br /> Additional analyses were performed for the North Sterling, Harmony, and Peterson systems <br /> ' (with Winter Diversions) to develop graphical relationships between storage volume, target <br /> releases, and reliability. Results are shown on Figures 2.2 through 2.4, which indicate the <br /> following: <br /> ' • Significantly more storage is needed to develop a reliable water supply using the <br /> � Y <br /> North Sterling system in comparison to the Harmony system or the Peterson system. <br /> ' For example, 10,000 acre-feet of storage could meet a target release of 3,000 acre-feet <br /> per year with 90 percent reliability(see Figure 2.2). The same target release and <br /> ' reliability could be achieved from the Harmony system with a reservoir of 3,600 acre- <br /> feet (see Figure 2.3). <br /> • A decrease in the reliability of meeting a target release amount enables a higher target <br /> release. For example, a 10,000 acre-foot reservoir supplied by the Harmony system <br /> could meet a target release of 1,400 acre-feet with 100 percent reliability(i.e., no <br /> ' shortages in the period of record) or a target release of 6,000 acre-feet with 90 percent <br /> reliability(i.e., shortages in 10 percent of the months when releases are made). <br /> • The Peterson system can provide the greatest target releases for given storage <br /> volumes. However, as shown later in the report,the Peterson system cannot be used <br /> ' to provide water to many of the more-attractive storage sites. <br /> As discussed in Section 5.1, water developed through additional storage in the Lower Basin <br /> ' could be released for a variety of beneficial uses. <br /> • <br /> 1 <br /> GEI Consultants, Inc. 2-15 01002 Dec 2001 Lower South Platte River Study <br /> 1 <br />