My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Lower South Platte River Study
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Lower South Platte River Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/20/2015 10:59:50 AM
Creation date
11/20/2015 10:58:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contractor Name
Colorado Water Conservation Board
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
175
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Lower South Platte River Study <br /> Colorado Water Conservation Board <br /> IDecember 2001 <br /> The feasible monthly diversions were used as input to a spreadsheet model that simulates <br /> Ireservoir operations with consideration (on a monthly basis) of: <br /> • Reservoir evaporation at 4.16 inches/month. <br /> I • Reservoir seepage at 0.2 percent of the storage contents per month. <br /> I • Specific target releases, following a monthly delivery schedule during the irrigation <br /> season(April through October). In each year of the 55-year record, there are seven <br /> I months (April through October) during which water is released (i.e., 385 months). <br /> The target releases can be viewed as a developed water supply with given levels of <br /> reliability. <br /> I <br /> Evaporation and seepage allowances given above are based on experience and judgment of <br /> Ithe consulting team. <br /> The spreadsheet model (Appendix A) was used to examine two cases for each canal system: <br /> I • No diversions during the winter months (December and January) in order to avoid <br /> problems with operations and maintenance due to ice, i.e., no winter diversion. <br /> I <br /> • A case in which winter diversions are assumed to be possible. <br /> IResults of the spreadsheet operations analyses are summarized below: <br /> I Target With Winter Diversions No Winter Diversions <br /> Target Target <br /> Supply System Storage Release Reliability Storage Release Reliability <br /> I (af) (af) `afl (at) <br /> North Sterling Canal 15,000 5,000 86% 15,000 5,000 80% <br /> 10,000 3,300 89% 10,000 3,300 83% <br /> I Harmony Ditch 15,000 5,000 95% 15,000 5,000 90% <br /> 10,000 3,300 95% 10,000 3,300 91% <br /> I Peterson Ditch 15,000 <br /> 10,000 5,000 96% 15,000 5,000 89% <br /> 3,300 98% 10,000 3,300 94% <br /> I Reliability is measured by the number of months in the period of record during which the <br /> target release of water can be met with the amount of storage provided. Results indicate that <br /> the ability to operate in winter would materially improve the reliability of the water supply <br /> Ideveloped with the new storage reservoir. <br /> I <br /> IGEI Consultants, Inc. 2-14 01002 Dec 2001 Lower South Platte River Study <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.