My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Misc documents inside sleeve
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
8001-9000
>
Misc documents inside sleeve
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/11/2015 10:39:14 AM
Creation date
11/11/2015 10:39:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
related to RICD Rulemaking 2001
State
CO
Date
11/8/2001
Author
CWCB
Title
CWCB RICD Rulemaking 2001
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Board Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
3. At the request of all of the parties, the Staff recommends moving elements of the second sentence of <br /> Rule 6 (control and minimum amount) and insert into paragraph 6 (maximum utilization) to become <br /> subparagraphs 6.e.ix and 6.e.x. • <br /> 4. The Staff recommends deleting the word"factors" from the last lines of Rule 6.a- 6.e to avoid confusing <br /> these considerations with the factors set forth in the statute. Thus, the last lines will read: "The Board, in <br /> making this finding, may consider,but is not limited to, the following factors:" <br /> 5. At the request of all of the parties, the Staff recommends striking the second sentence in Rule 7 as <br /> follows. <br /> may factor the Applicant's econem is &ituatiea into its recommendation. <br /> 6. The Staff recommends rewriting the second sentence of Rule 12.d as follows: <br /> Written submissions shall include,but not be limited to the following: 1) prehearing and rebuttal <br /> statements;a list of all disputed faces legal issues; 2) the positien of the Party regarding the factual <br /> and legal issues; 3)2) a list identifying all of the witnesses that will testify for the Party, and a summary <br /> of the testimony that those witnesses will provide; 4-)and, 3) copies of all exhibits that the Party will <br /> introduce at the hearing(s); and, 5)prehearing and rebuttal statement&. <br /> 7. Because hearings regarding RICDs are not quasi-adjudicatory hearings subject to section 24-4-105 of t� <br /> APA and because the recommendations of the Board to the water court are not intended to adversely <br /> affect the protected rights of any individual, the Staff suggests the following addition to the Statement of <br /> Basis and Purpose: <br /> As stated in section 37-92-305(13), C.R.S., the water court shall apply the factors set forth in section 37- <br /> 92-102(6), C.R.S. and make its own determination regarding the issuance of a decree for a RICD. All <br /> findings of fact contained in the CWCB's recommendation shall be presumptive as to such facts, subject <br /> to rebuttal by any party. <br /> • <br /> Flood Protection•Water Project Planning and Financing•Stream and Lake Protection <br /> Water Supply Protection•Conservation Planning <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.