Laserfiche WebLink
<r, <br /> Stakeholders Group <br /> Outline of Wild&Scenic Alternative Management Plan <br /> DRAFT September 8,2008 <br /> Introduction: The Stakeholders Group plan collaboratively balances permanent protection of the <br /> ORVs;certainty for the stakeholders;water project yield; and flexibility for landowners, <br /> management agencies and water users. A significant benefit of the plan is that through the <br /> cooperative and voluntary efforts of interested water users,the ORVs can be protected(and <br /> perhaps enhanced)in ways that could not be achieved through Congressional designation as Wild <br /> & Scenic,or through BLM management criteria. <br /> II. Description of ORVs. <br /> A. In its March 2007 Eligibility Report,the BLM identified segments of rivers where the <br /> river is"free flowing"and contains at least one river-related value that is considered to be <br /> "outstandingly remarkable." The determination of whether a segment contains an ORV <br /> i . .rof=.sional judgment based on identification of a unique,rare,or exemplary feature. <br /> LMs is erdisciplinary team identified ORVs in the segments for which the Stakeholders <br /> 5 • :.. (SG)a<drafting this Management Plan. Segments 4-7 include recreation ORVs <br /> that are recognized by the SG as flow-dependent values. A recreation ORV is recognized <br /> by its unique or rare attraction within the region. It is based on"interpretive <br /> opportunities"that attract visitors and rivers that"provide settings for national and <br /> regional usage or competitive events." For example,fishing was recognized as an ORV <br /> in segments 4 and 5, in part,because certain segments are"managed by the Colorado <br /> DOW as Wild Trout Waters,"and these streams"give anglers an opportunity to catch <br /> wild trout." <br /> Other ORVs identified for the segments include: wildlife(bald eagle nesting and winter <br /> habitat,river otter habitat),botanical(riparian plant communities); and scenic. <br /> The SG believes it is important to document and understand the conditions that describe <br /> the ORVs identified in segments 4-7,both currently and in the future. The SG believes <br /> that current information and data describing the ORVs needs to be supplemented over the <br /> next 1 to 5 years to gain an adequate description of the ORVs. <br /> 1. Recreational fishing [provide description] <br /> 2. Recreational floatboating[provide description] <br /> B. Description of Existing Conditions. <br /> 1. The stream morphology of the Colorado River has been shaped by changing <br /> hydrology over the past century and longer. This historical hydrology variation is <br /> illustrated in Figure 1,which represents the average hydrographs for the Kremmling <br /> stream gage for the periods of 1904 to 1919 (pre-Moffat), 1962 to 1984(pre-1984 <br /> Operating Rules for GMR and pre-Windy Gap),and 1985 to Present(generally <br /> representative of current water rights operations). While this historical perspective <br /> Page 1 of 15 <br />