Laserfiche WebLink
• Additional contract proposals are being considered <br /> and being put out for bid. <br /> b. A motion for summary judgement will be filed in <br /> the Dinosaur case concerning the purposes of the <br /> reservation. <br /> c. Naval Oil Shale - Judge Ossola has granted the <br /> U.S. claim to include non-appurtenant uses, but <br /> held that the priority of those claimed water <br /> rights could not be antedated. Result is that if <br /> decreed, they will have a 1983 priority and the <br /> U.S. may appeal. <br /> d. Sierra Club suit against the U.S. and the State <br /> Engineer <br /> (1) Filed in U.S. District Court January 3, 1984, <br /> (2) Against the United States to file reserved <br /> rights claims in Wilderness Areas and to <br /> increase claims for Rocky Mountain National <br /> Park and Mesa Verde National Park. <br /> (3) The claim against the State Engineer is that <br /> he should recognize these yet unclaimed and <br /> • undecreed water rights; <br /> e. Mineral Springs claims by the U.S . around Glenwood <br /> Springs have been withdrawn by the United States <br /> and as a result dismissed by the Court. <br /> 4. Colorado v. Mexico - Oral argument before the Supreme <br /> Court on January 9, 1984 on the Special Master 's re- <br /> vised findings and recommendations . <br /> 5. "Huston" Case <br /> a. Petitions for rehearing denied on November 9, <br /> 1983. <br /> b. Ruling modified - prospective only portion of <br /> ruling is deleted (S .B. 439 purports to validate <br /> previous non-tributary ground water decrees ) . <br /> c. Court notes S.B . 439, but refuses to pass on its <br /> validity. <br /> Mr. Woodard discussed the Riverside versus Stipo Case which <br /> involved the Riverside Reservoir proposed for construction on <br /> Wildcat Creek. As discussed in previous meetings the Corps of <br /> Engineers refused to grant a 404 permit under its authority by <br /> • the Clean Water Act. In subsequent litigation the District Judge <br /> -9- <br />