Laserfiche WebLink
( l) Addition of a phrase and statutory citation at the <br /> conclusion of the introduction on page 1 which would <br /> reflect the Board ' s responsibilities for recommending <br /> to the General Assembly whether or not projects <br /> proposed by the Colorado Water Resources and Power <br /> Development Authority should be authorized , <br /> (2) Addition of a sentence or two in the first full <br /> paragraph on page 3 of the draft indicating that <br /> Congress has under consideration the termination of <br /> mineral leasing payments to the State, which may mean <br /> that this source of funding for the CWCB construction <br /> fund will not be available in the future , <br /> (3 ) Adding to the table an additional project entitled <br /> "Reservoir Site Protection" in the aggregate amount of <br /> 35-10 million as a grant, this addition being <br /> consistent with the position previously taken by the <br /> Board that the State should consider acquiring <br /> reservoir sites which are in jeopardy of undergoing <br /> land use development which would make their future use <br /> as reservoir sites financially prohibitive , and <br /> (4.) In the table , under the remarks for "Rehabilitation <br /> Projects , " add a comment to the effect that the bulk <br /> of rehabilitation work will be addressed to reservoirs <br /> which are under storage restrictions by the State <br /> Engineer ' s office due to dam safety concerns . <br /> Board discussion ensued , with Mr . Wright suggesting that <br /> Item No . 1 on page l should be expanded to make it clear that <br /> these 5—year projections include only such projects as require <br /> appropriations of state moneys because that is the statutory <br /> Criteria which apply to the CWCB construction fund . It was <br /> also suggested that the table be reorganized to present the <br /> projects in the order of priorities set forth in the text . <br /> After some further discussion, Mr . Wright moved , seconded <br /> by Mr . Meyring , that the "Five—Year Projections for Water <br /> Project Funding" be adopted by the Board with the four changes <br /> recommended by Mr . McDonald , with the change recommended by Mr . <br /> Wright , and with the table reorganized to reflect the projects <br /> being listed in order of priority . The motion passed <br /> unanimously , with Mr . Robbins abstaining and Mr . Getches not <br /> voting , he having had to excuse himself from the meeting during <br /> the discussion of this agenda item. <br /> Discussion Agenda item 7 — of Water Financing <br /> Mr . McDonald introduced this agenda item by referring to <br /> his memorandum to the Board on the status of various <br />