Laserfiche WebLink
regulations the requirement that there be a case-by-case review <br /> and detailed hydrologic or hydraulic investigation for all • <br /> rezoning and development activities within the approximate <br /> 100-year floodplain. <br /> 6 . The federal government and local governments will be <br /> strongly encouraged by the Board to perform detailed floodplain <br /> studies, it being the strong preference of the Board to base <br /> its floodplain designations and approvals on detailed <br /> engineering studies to the maximum extent possible. <br /> Motion adopted unanimously. <br /> Agenda Item 10 - Instream Flow Program - Appendix D <br /> a . Ratify Statement of Opposition, Case No . 5-84CW285, <br /> Little Elk Creek Village . (Members Robbins and <br /> Lochhead abstained because of attorney-client <br /> relationship) . <br /> Mr . Vandemoer moved, seconded by Mr . Covert, that the Board <br /> not ratify the statement of opposition filed by the staff and <br /> that the staff be authorized to withdraw the statement of <br /> opposition. Motion adopted unanimously. <br /> b. Withdrawal of statement of opposition, Case No. <br /> 4-84CW053 , W. L. and Dewanna L. Gray. • <br /> Mr . Smith moved, seconded by Mr . Covert, that the Board <br /> authorize the staff to withdraw its statement of opposition <br /> ratified by the Board at its July 13 , 1984, meeting. Motion <br /> adopted unanimously. <br /> c . Informational Items . <br /> Mr . Jencsok reported on this item during which he discussed <br /> the following instream flow matters : <br /> (1) Wet Mountain Valley cases. <br /> (2) Green Mountain Reservoir Environmental Impact Statement <br /> being prepared by the Bureau of Reclamation. <br /> (3 ) Preliminary instream flow recommendations in Summit <br /> County as related to the Green Mountain Reservoir water sales. <br /> (4) Resolution of Case No . 7-83CW144 , Westfork Development, <br /> Ltd. <br /> No Board action taken. <br /> • <br /> -8- <br />