My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Board Meeting 02/16/1984
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
DayForward
>
2001-3000
>
Board Meeting 02/16/1984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/25/2014 11:36:37 AM
Creation date
11/25/2014 11:36:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
2/16/1984
Description
Minutes, Agenda, Memorandums February 16, 1984
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
the Upper Division states in order that those four states might <br /> finance water project construction which will achieve a level of 4 <br /> development equivalent to that represented by their authorized, <br /> but as yet unconstructed, participating projects. <br /> Colorado proposes federal legislation amending the 1956 <br /> Colorado River Storage Project Act to make CRSP power revenues <br /> payable directly to the Upper Division states. Such funds would <br /> then be used by the states to finance project construction in <br /> order that the level of development agreed to by Congress, the <br /> seven Colorado River Basin states, and the purchasers of CRSP <br /> power can be achieved. <br /> Availability of CRSP Power Revenues • <br /> 1 . Revenues for direct payment to the Upper Division states <br /> would come from three sources: <br /> a. The current rate setting procedure would be changed <br /> to utilize the "window" concept endorsed by the <br /> Colorado River Energy Distributors Association <br /> (CREDA) . In addition, repayment of power features <br /> would take place over a full 50 year period so as to <br /> minimize the rate for CRSP power. The net effect of <br /> these changes would be a reduction in the annual <br /> revenues needed for repayment from what would <br /> otherwise be required under current rate setting <br /> -2- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.