Laserfiche WebLink
the legislation in the Senate will occur in early March. <br /> • Hearings on the legislation in the appropriate House committee <br /> were uncertain. <br /> 4. Grand Mesa Water Conservancy District <br /> In the November 1983 meeting, Mr. McDonald reported on <br /> the efforts of this district to reformulate its proposed project, <br /> including the inclusion of hydroelectric power production. Despite <br /> these efforts, the feasibility of the proposal was questionable. <br /> As a consequence, the Water Resources and Power Development <br /> Authority declined to fund additional feasibility studies. Fol- <br /> lowing this decision, the District submitted an application to the <br /> Board for funds to conduct a basic hydrology study of the proposed <br /> project. Action on this application is deferred pending consensus <br /> by proponents and opponents of the proposed study. <br /> 5. 404 permits In Mesa, Delta, and Montrose Counties <br /> The Uncompahgre Water Users Association, in its efforts <br /> to continue its rehab work on its irrigation system, alleged that <br /> it is encountering problems in obtaining 404 permits from the <br /> Corps of Engineers, particularly where repairs are being made on <br /> structures in the Uncompahgre River. <br /> In following up on these allegations with the District <br /> Engineer, Corps of Engineers, Mr. McDonald learned that the Corps <br /> is, in fact, denying permits in certain cases. . These denials, for <br /> the most part, are based on conditions imposed by other water <br /> resource agencies--the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) , the <br /> U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the Colorado Division of <br /> Wildlife--which agencies are, by statute, required to review the <br /> permit applications. These agencies claim that, in some cases, <br /> issuance of the permit would be detrimental to fish habitat require- <br /> ments. In other cases, denials are based on design standards for <br /> 404 permits imposed by the Corps of Engineers. <br /> In concluding the discussion on this item, Mr. McDonald <br /> stated that the Board staff, in coordination with the State <br /> Engineer, is gathering field data as to the extent of, and reasons <br /> for, the problems; and with this information, Mr. McDonald will <br /> contact the District Engineer and attempt to resolve this issue <br /> in the very near future. <br /> 6. South Platte River Basin Water Management Study <br /> In discussing this item, Mr. McDonald reported that the <br /> National Academy of Sciences, a research agency, completed a water <br /> management study in the Potomac River Basin through a sophisticated <br /> modeling procedure. This agency recently contacted the Bureau of <br /> Reclamation (BR) for recommendations as to which river basins would <br /> be suitable for a comparable study in the western states. The BR <br /> • (Lower Missouri Region) suggested the South Platte River Basin, <br /> -3- <br />