My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Board Meeting 03/15/1984
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
DayForward
>
2001-3000
>
Board Meeting 03/15/1984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/25/2014 8:54:47 AM
Creation date
11/24/2014 3:59:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
3/15/1984
Description
Minutes, Agenda, Memorandums March 15, 1984
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
154
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
III <br /> Senator Fred Anderson <br /> April 4, 1980 <br /> Page two <br /> federal Water Supply Act of 1958 , annual interest charges of <br /> 3 .046 percent were deferred for a period of 10 years . This grace <br /> period expired in 1979 and interest is now accruing at better <br /> than $300 ,000 per year. <br /> Proposal <br /> I recommend that the General Assembly authorize the expen- <br /> diture of monies from the Board's construction fund for the purpose <br /> of entering into a contract with the United States to repay the <br /> $9 .2 million construction cost, plus interest, which is allocated <br /> to regulatory capacity (I suggest a $10 million authorization to <br /> cover the accumulation of interest) . By assuming this reimbursable <br /> cost, the State would obtain the right to market all or any portion <br /> of the yield of the regulatory capacity of Ruedi Reservoir at such <br /> prices as it may choose. In turn, the revenues so generated, minus <br /> allocable operation and maintenance costs , would be deposited in <br /> the Board's construction fund for use in the construction of new <br /> projects . <br /> This proposal is advanced with three considerations in mind: <br /> (1) That a portion of the regulatory capacity should be <br /> devoted to maintaining a reasonable recreation pool for the reser- <br /> voir, which means that the marketable yield of the regulatory <br /> capacity is likely to be less than 48 ,000 acre-feet, <br /> (2) That the interests of the Colorado River Water Conserva- <br /> tion District in this matter should be taken into account, and <br /> (3) That there should be ample opportunity for input from <br /> all interested parties into decisions about the sale of water from <br /> the reservoir. <br /> Discussion <br /> The proposal to assume the repayment of the reimbursable <br /> costs of Ruedi Reservoir has two major advantages : <br /> (1) It is an investment which, in my considered opinion, is <br /> likely to earn a good rate of return in the form of revenues from • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.