Laserfiche WebLink
unless further action is requested by any party who has made an <br /> appearance in this case. <br /> H. In addition to the continuing jurisdiction set forth in <br /> paragraph G, any party of record may in the future request a hearing <br /> before the Court for the following purposes: <br /> (1) To review the adequacy of the Applicant's <br /> compliance with, or the Division Engineer's administration <br /> of, the provisions of this decree as set forth in paragraph <br /> 5c(3) . <br /> (2) To review the sufficiency of the accounting system <br /> set forth in paragraph 5c(4) . <br /> (3) To determine whether or not the Applicant has <br /> violated any of the terms of the volumetric limitation or <br /> rolling average clauses set forth in paragraphs 5c(5) and <br /> 5c(6) . <br /> (4) To determine whether or not the Applicant has <br /> shown that a Plan of Reuse or Successive Use described in <br /> paragraph 6 will damage any of the vested water rights of <br /> the parties of record. <br /> As to these matters, the Applicant shall continue to bear the burden <br /> of proof showing no material injury because of a violation of these <br /> restrictions. <br /> I. The approval of this decree by the Colorado Water <br /> Conservation Board (Board) is contingent upon the Board's approval of <br /> this decree at their meeting, May 5 and 6, 1983. In the event that <br /> the decree is not so approved, the Board shall file a notice with the <br /> Court, and serve each party with the notice, indicating that the <br /> 9 <br />