Laserfiche WebLink
Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District Agenda Item 28b <br /> November 19-20,2014 Board Meeting (Updated November 21, 2014) <br /> Page 4 of 5 <br /> Updated Financial Analysis <br /> The Enterprise qualifies for a 2% Hydropower interest rate for a 30 year term. <br /> TABLE 2: FINANCIAL SUMMARY <br /> Total Project Cost $5,669,340 <br /> Borrower Contribution (approximately 10%) $585,000 <br /> CWCB Loan Amount (90%) $5,084,340 <br /> CWCB Loan Amount (Including 1% Service Fee) $5,135,183 <br /> Annual CWCB Loan Payment $229,286 <br /> Annual CWCB Loan Obligation (Including 10% Reserve) $252,214 <br /> Project Cost per kilo-watt hour (5.0 MW/year) $1.13 <br /> Creditworthiness: The Enterprise has successfully constructed the $6.7M Carter Hydropower plant <br /> with the two loans shown in Table 3 and made two annual loan payments. <br /> TABLE 3: EXISTING ENTERPRISE DEBT <br /> Maturity Remaining Annual Collateral <br /> Loan Date Balance Payment <br /> CO Water Resources and <br /> Power Development Authority 2032 $1,918,000 $122,313 Pledge of System <br /> (Carter Lake Hydro Project) Revenues <br /> Northern Colorado Water <br /> Conservancy District 2032 $4,539,000 $289,516 Pledge of System <br /> (Carter Lake Hydro Project) Revenues <br /> TOTAL $6,457,000 $411,829 <br /> TABLE 4: FINANCIAL RATIOS11l <br /> Carter Lake (2) Granby <br /> Financial Ratio Hydro Hydro(3) <br /> Projections Projections <br /> Operating Ratio (revenues/expenses) 104% 109% <br /> weak: <100% - average: 100% - 120% - 'strong: >120%I (Average) (Average) <br /> $557K/$537K $349K/$320K <br /> Debt Service Coverage Ratio 105% 113% <br /> (revenues-expenses)/debt service (Average) (Average) <br /> weak: <100% - average: 100% - 120% - strong: >120°/I $557K $125K $349K-$91K <br /> $412K $229K <br /> Cash Reserves to Current Expenses <br /> weak: <50%II- average: 50% - 100% strong: >1001 N/A N/A(4) <br /> (1) The District provided audited financials for the Enterprise for 2012 and 2013 however staff has <br /> determined the information is not directly applicable since the Carter Lake project was under <br /> construction and not yet in repayment on its loans. It also did not reflect two full years of <br /> power production. <br />