Laserfiche WebLink
Xi <br /> A <br /> 0 <br /> 0 <br /> 39 ° <br /> modifications in Article I with respect to paragraphs B and C? <br /> I hear none. Then for the record this draft will be revised 0 <br /> to delete paragraph B in its entirety; paragraph C will be <br /> redesignated as paragraph B; the word "projeot" will be added <br /> after the word "Reservoir", and the words "flood control and" N <br /> will be deleted. <br /> Going now to Article II, a suggestion from the Chief of <br /> Engineers which is not contained in General reringa4 a letter, <br /> which I discussed with the representatives of the Chief of <br /> Engineers and is as follows: <br /> In the second line from the bottom strike the words <br /> from operating John Martin Reservoir". This, now, is a <br /> suggestion, and I give it to you for consideration, and if <br /> and when it is adopted I will so indicate for the record. <br /> Strike those words in that line and add at the end of the <br /> sentence the following words, "apportioning the waters re- <br /> leased from the John Martin Reservoir as operated by the Corps <br /> of Engineers" The explanation for that language is this, and <br /> it is merely a clarifying change: The original wording implies <br /> that the experience from operating John Martin Dam rent to the <br /> state, or the inference is that the operation of John Martin <br /> Dam was in the hands of the state, and it is merely a clarify- <br /> ing of that, but it was the experience gained while the oper- <br /> ation was under the Corps of Engineers. That is one of the <br />