My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Transcripts of the Arkansas River Compact Commissions 11/08,09,10/1948
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
7001-8000
>
Transcripts of the Arkansas River Compact Commissions 11/08,09,10/1948
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/18/2014 1:47:37 PM
Creation date
11/18/2014 1:16:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Sixteenth Meeting of the Arkansas River Compact Commissions 11/08,09,10/1948 Denver, Co.
State
CO
Author
Commissioners
Title
Sixteenth Meeting of the Arkansas River Compact Commissions 11/08,09,10/1948 Denver, Co.
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
172
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> m <br /> 0 <br /> 0 <br /> c <br /> 0 <br /> 14 0 <br /> CHAIRMAN KRAMER& I would offer this comment, Mr. Knapp, <br /> that since you have called attention to that apparent moan- -' <br /> 0 <br /> sietenoy, that for the purposes of this commission, I think <br /> our interest lies primarily is the data on storage capacity, <br /> that is, the acre feet of volume, and I think it gets con- <br /> fusing if you try to keep in mind the surface area at the <br /> same time. What we are interested in in the final analysis. <br /> is as pointed out; you can have a change in surface area <br /> and not a corresponding change in volume. What we are inter- <br /> ested in here really is the final analysis of what the <br /> change is in storage capacity, that is, the volume in acre <br /> feet. <br /> MR. KNAPP: That is very true, Mr. Chairman. I put <br /> those two down because both figures are carried in each of <br /> these reports. If you prefer, I will make no more reference <br /> to the surface area. <br /> CHAIR LRAM: I think it would be less confusing, <br /> though I may be wrong. I think both figures together are <br /> difficult to follow without the aid of a board or chart or <br /> something. I think if you concentrate on volume, that will <br /> be more significant. <br /> MR. KNAPP: I was proposing to go next to the capacity <br /> of the reservoir at elevation 3,8,81. The initial capacity <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.