My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Transcripts of the Arkansas River Compact Commissions 05/30 06/01,02,03/1948
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
7001-8000
>
Transcripts of the Arkansas River Compact Commissions 05/30 06/01,02,03/1948
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/25/2014 4:09:04 PM
Creation date
11/18/2014 11:14:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Thirteenth Meeting of the Arkansas River Compact Commissions 05/30 06/01,02,03/1948 Denver, Co.
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Author
Commissioners
Title
Thirteenth Meeting of the Arkansas River Compact Commissions 05/30 06/01,02,03/1948 Denver, Co.
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Meeting
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
202
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
38 <br /> O <br /> O <br /> D <br /> -i <br /> to that. IL the fourth line, that is the first reference <br /> to it. <br /> n x A}; : That is right, and John Martin O z <br /> Reservoir is defined in a subsequent paragraph anyway, <br /> n <br /> I . HOE: Take out the said"? <br /> w <br /> M . TATE: So that it will read, "of John Martin <br /> MR, AV: It probably reads the way it is because <br /> you refer to it in S. <br /> HR. TAM: Well, it might. <br /> CHA.IRMA.J ICRAIEY#1 . But it is defined in Article III, <br /> La. TATS. It is defined later. The first reference <br /> tot it s I this s '+tale. <br /> .Lis �..0 �� irrclu �,+. <br /> CH IRI KRA=R `Aoi.l, I c..ra still not quite satis— <br /> Pied with the second line, "the ' aatert of the Arkansas River <br /> and their utilization and the benefits"— <br /> h A. IR : In the €eaond Kansas case the Court <br /> says this: "All these considerations persuade us that Kansas <br /> has not sustained her allegations that Colorado's use has <br /> materially increased, and that the Increase has worked a <br /> serious detriment to the substantial interests of Kansas.," <br /> They seem to stay right with that theory of use. <br /> R. ROIL: could it help any to substitute a comma for <br /> that first "aund."V <br /> h fl : For the f r t "and"? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.