Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> 37 <br /> 0 <br /> 0 <br /> m <br /> 0 <br /> prinoiplen that we seek to preserve in FAll negotiations <br /> of this kind is Mate control of the waters; and in Para,.. <br /> graph A we have used that expression, "the waters of the Z <br /> Arkaneae River and their control, conservation and utilize-. <br /> tion for irrigation and other beriefioial purposes," so why <br /> w <br /> not leave it in C the oame way? <br /> CHAIRMAN t RA)?. Because A, as I read it, has to do <br /> with settlement of the diaputec concerning the waters of the <br /> Arkansas River, whtoh includes their use, whereas C speed— <br /> finally deals with apporticent, and apportionment, as I <br /> understand it, legally can only go to use. <br /> ::. IRELAND; The Supreme Court adopted that thought <br /> on the division of use. On page 2 .were, speaking of the <br /> first °ace, :way back in 1901, or whatever it was, it Bays: <br /> "The measure of the reciprocal rights and obligations of the <br /> states was declared to be an equitable apportionment of the <br /> benefito of the river. " That certainly weans a division of <br /> the uee of the :water benefits. <br /> CHAIRMAN TRAM R: As distinct from phynical possession. <br /> MR. IRELAND: i yst al division or- possession.- . <br /> CHAIRMAN i is Yes. Any other comment with respect <br /> to Paragraph C? <br /> 11A. TATS Yee, the two words the said" SU:uedi atoly <br /> preceding "John Martin Reservoir" should come out:. There . <br /> to no reference or no mention of John !15;.:-tin Ro cervoir. prior <br />