My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Transcripts of the Arkansas River Compact Commissions 05/30 06/01,02,03/1948
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
7001-8000
>
Transcripts of the Arkansas River Compact Commissions 05/30 06/01,02,03/1948
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/25/2014 4:09:04 PM
Creation date
11/18/2014 11:14:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Thirteenth Meeting of the Arkansas River Compact Commissions 05/30 06/01,02,03/1948 Denver, Co.
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Author
Commissioners
Title
Thirteenth Meeting of the Arkansas River Compact Commissions 05/30 06/01,02,03/1948 Denver, Co.
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Meeting
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
202
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
32 <br /> rn <br /> D <br /> rent-.-cuppone you add something eiae in the body of the <br /> actual agreement ent or the Compact, it is still binding. <br /> M . IRELAND: That is right. Those are the bigger Z <br /> things. I would just as soon leave it in as it is. <br /> HR, TATS: Well, I am not objecting to it. <br /> CHAIRMAN K'}R: There ie good precedent for leaving <br /> it in. <br /> MR. Th LA :D t Oh, I mould be perfectly willing to <br /> leave it. I Juet called. .attention to it. <br /> MR. VIDALi Of course we lawyert are disposed to fol- <br /> low precedent and prior similar agreements, although we may <br /> any one of un think that we &of e1 know uhy they were in there <br /> or Y,rhy, it ?rf c worded that way, but there mast have been come <br /> good reason. I don't nee that it is important. enough to <br /> argue about. <br /> MR. IRELAND: I have one more thought:. In that first <br /> : ,r ar raph i ould the ward. "ucioe" he better than "purpoaeffi"? <br /> we start out here with p zrpoaes, the first ;.- remises, major <br /> purposes. Are they beneficial peirpoaoa or beneficial uses? <br /> t. %rID L: Neill., you use the word utilization. Utilizes- <br /> . <br /> tion and uaea doesn't go together. It is euperrogatory <br /> Didn't we have some diseusaion about the une of the more <br /> citizens" in t';ere? At o,zr last ric,fltirig scam't there some <br /> cue; tiozn rmised about that? <br /> '`;"?. ARV: I think ere again .;qe a dopted a stook <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.