My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Transcripts of the Arkansas River Compact Commissions 08/11,12/1947
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
7001-8000
>
Transcripts of the Arkansas River Compact Commissions 08/11,12/1947
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/18/2014 1:49:34 PM
Creation date
11/18/2014 11:13:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Tenth Meeting of the Arkansas River Compact Commissions 08/11,12/1947 Colorado Springs, Co.
State
CO
Author
Commissioners
Title
Tenth Meeting of the Arkansas River Compact Commissions 08/11,12/1947 Colorado Springs, Co.
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
121
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
TJ <br /> m <br /> 42 <br /> o <br /> o <br /> c � <br /> 0 <br /> li <br /> MR. KNAPP: 'To cover quantities as well as the for- <br /> ZI <br /> mula. D <br /> H <br /> 0 : <br /> MR. PATTERSON: I think that is correct. We have <br /> got to have something to sit down and talk about. I hate <br /> to do it, but I would life to second the motion so that the ml <br /> discussion will get on a logical basis. <br />._. CHAIRMAN KRAMER: Or would you care to defer the <br /> second to someone from Kansas? <br /> MR. TATE: I would second it. As I understand the <br /> motion, it is to be used as a basis for negotiation. That <br /> may change the plan of operation somewhat, it may change the <br /> quantity somewhat, but we will now have that formula to work <br /> on or to negotiate on that basis. <br /> CHAIRMAN KRAMER: That is the football we put into <br /> play. Now we'll tick it around some. <br /> 4R. VIDAL: I may say, as far as I am concerned, and <br /> I think the members of the Legal Affairs Committee would have <br /> the same view as to the administration of whatever compact <br /> we have, I wouldn' t follow the :Mendenhall-Leavitt plan-- <br /> MR. IRELAND: Well, I don' t understand this is going <br /> into the administrative end of it. <br /> MR. VIDAL: --wouldn't follow the Mendenhall-- <br /> CHAlkMAN KAAMER: May I at this juncture for the <br /> purpose of clarifying the record state, with Mr. Patterson' s <br /> permission, that the motion submitted by Mr. Mendenhall has <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.