Laserfiche WebLink
36 <br /> ;o <br /> 0 <br /> 0 <br /> C <br /> 0 <br /> m <br /> U <br /> --i <br /> maybe not to the extent of giving us your blessing in the <br /> attempt, or denying us the opportunity of exploring the <br /> thing. Z <br /> Here is the proposition set forth in the last sen— <br /> tence, the sentence at the top of page 2 of our engineering = <br /> report. I would like to hear what this Commission has to (f) <br /> say about that proposal, if anything. Maybe you don' t wish <br /> to comment on it. <br /> CHAIRMAN KRA SEER: i want to point out the fact, to <br /> put this in more specific terms, that we are hoping to de- <br /> velop as a basis of apportionment, patterning them, not <br /> necessarily in the same language or in the same figures at <br /> all, but patterning them after the pattern of the Mendenhall <br /> Leavitt setup. To be perfectly direct about it, that is the <br /> line of our thinking, to use that pattern as a bale for a <br /> formula for a permanent compact. <br /> AR, IRELAND: Well, assuming that the administrative <br /> pattern that would follow that type of an arrangement can be <br /> reasonably carried out, it would seem that would be much <br /> more desirable than to go into the complicated formula that <br /> would be harder to understand. In other words, we have had <br /> some experience with that. It seems to work and it le more <br /> simple. <br /> CHAIRMAN KRAMER: The corollary to the consideration <br /> of a formula would be the consideration of an edministra- <br />