Laserfiche WebLink
29 <br /> O <br /> 0 <br /> C7 <br /> in our views on it. <br /> MR. PATTER$ON: Yes, and it would be perfectly <br /> proper in the absence of instructions otherwise it and when <br /> we make a final report as the Engineering Committee to use <br /> 0 <br /> those terms, but I wouldn' t assume it would block the Com.. < <br /> mission in the preparation of a compact. They might want <br /> to adopt some other language. <br /> MR. IRELAND: Doesn't the word 'tentatively" clear <br /> up the thing? Can't we go ahead on that basis until we <br /> change our mind? We are not bound by it, none of us are, <br /> but we understand that is the way it is going to be worked <br /> out until we say something different. <br /> . MR. KNAPP: My purpose in malting the motion was mere- <br /> ly to ascertain whether or not there was any objection to <br /> our using these terms, in doing what we state we are going <br /> to do, and in effect getting the approval of the Commission <br /> to do it. <br /> CHAIRMAN KRAMER: Unfortunately, as I understood the <br /> motion, the first part of it we are discussing, in attempting <br /> to do that you are putting the Commission on record in a <br /> broader sense and we don' t need--at least that is my feeling, <br /> Mr. Patterson, but perhaps this is different. I don't feel <br /> we need the Commission' s sanction to adopt the language used. <br /> MR. ICNAPP: In view of the discussion we have had <br /> since the motion, with the consent of the second, I am will- <br />